Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
what do you guys think? Building a pretty crazy computer (i7-6700k, crossfire 290x, samsung 950 m.2 sd)
And only spending $30 for my air cooled fan. Will slight overclocking be fine on it?
Depending on the CPU, 4.5GHz sounds about right. The 6700K is a 4.2 GHz chip stock.
What stress test do you use for 4.5GHz 70s with a 212 EVO?I went with an existing NVidia 980, but basically just built the same thing, with the EVO. I'm running 4.5 at 1.32V with idle in the 30s, load in the 70s. I stopped at 4.5 not because of heat, but I sort of lost the silicon lottery on this 6700k - for 4.6 I have to jump to at least 1.4V, and 4.7 looks like it's about 1.45V.
What stress test do you use for 4.5GHz 70s with a 212 EVO?
Which test in P95? Small FFT? Blend? Large FFT? They are significantly different.![]()
Wow when I upgrade I'm going to save some money and go with 212 EVO, l wood like to run prime95 at 4.5GHz with that setup.![]()
what do you guys think? Building a pretty crazy computer (i7-6700k, crossfire 290x, samsung 950 m.2 sd)
And only spending $30 for my air cooled fan. Will slight overclocking be fine on it?
That is how I have always tested Default Blend, it is good to see that the 212 EVO does so well with the i7 6700k, most of the people that are frequently here won't even touch prime95.Just default Blend. Was just wanting to heat up the system and see if it was going to error or crash, not trying to be particularly rigorous.
That makes sense on the temps. Small FFT will only test the CPU and it gets much warmer.![]()
You guys really should do a Small FFT test, most video editing/fold/seti software and some games do comparable temperatures.