Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Speaking of Linux, is this why Linux seems to write and read slower than Windows? Because Windows just throws the files anywhere convenient while Linux takes its time to sort them as it writes? Is this why Linux doesn't need defragging?
i use Auslogics Disk defrag and Registy defrag.
it's free btw. you can get it from www.download.com
is DisKeeper free? i'm tempted
diskeeper is cool and the one redduc posted is nice also
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.6001]
Copyright (c) 2006 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
C:\Windows\system32>defrag /?
Description: Locates and consolidates fragmented files on local volumes to
improve system performance.
Syntax: defrag <volume> -a [-v]
defrag <volume> [{-r | -w}] [-f] [-v]
defrag -c [{-r | -w}] [-f] [-v]
Parameters:
Value Description
<volume> Specifies the drive letter or mount point path of the volume to
be defragmented or analyzed.
-c Defragments all volumes on this computer.
-a Performs fragmentation analysis only.
-r Performs partial defragmentation (default). Attempts to
consolidate only fragments smaller than 64 megabytes (MB).
-w Performs full defragmentation. Attempts to consolidate all file
fragments, regardless of their size.
-f Forces defragmentation of the volume when free space is low.
-v Specifies verbose mode. The defragmentation and analysis output
is more detailed.
-? Displays this help information.
Examples:
defrag d:
defrag d:\vol\mountpoint -w -f
defrag d: -a -v
defrag -c -v
Yea it does seem to run slow, but at the same time I don't usually do things while I am defragging so RAM usage is of little importance to me. But what I really getting at is, exactly why and what it doesn't do well while defragging.
I don't completely understand the whole defragging process, but to me it would seem like all the programs have the same goal, which is removing fragments from the drive. So no matter what the program is, they all have the same objective which is removing fragments. But what it sounds like is the other programs do it faster and with less resources, but in the end still do the same job which is remove the fragments.
i use diskeeper 2008 pro
only diskeeper lite is free & it dosn't work on vista due to vista's VSS