• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

Best MB for overclocking

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

Bad Maniac

Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2001
In your opinion wich one Motherboard is the best for overclocking Athlons in terms of stability/highest posssible clock speed.

Just to sort things out between us.
 
do u want an sdram board or ddr?
what kind of cooling will u have?
what components do u allready have?
r u considering raid?
if u r than the board i have is a good o/c board.it is the only board i know of that will run the delta black label fan on the fan header but there may be others now.if u want to o/c from the keyboard instead of using jumpers,its good for that.
i might mention that some users have experienced some issues with this board including myself,however i have not determined that these issues r due to the board and not due to my own ignorance of the hardware configuration and setup.
without more info this is a unanswerable question.
the kt7a and the iwill r both good mb's for sdram.
i might also add the experience i have gained from this board has been worth much more than its cost.
 
Well, I already run a liquid cooled (not water) Amd athlon 13.33 @ 1.97 on a concept motherboard, from an unamed manufacturer. using sdram. I am going to build a multi media/Gamer computer with a Geforce 3, so I guess It would be ddr memory then, to give the best boost to performance. and whatever Athlon that´s fastest at the moment. no Raid, since I will ojnly use two ata-100 Hdd:s and an ide DvD. So DDR memory, no Raid. and Liquid cooling, with fans for MB cooling.
 
you will only use 2 ata100 hdd's?? that makes absolutely no sense, i run 2 western digital ata 100 20 gig drives in raid 0 and it makes a huge difference, that comment u made was insane.
 
Oh dear. Let me clarify. I will use one ata-100 as small as I can find, only for the system- and swap files, and another large(ish) ata-100 for all other files. Atleast in my previous tests this has made a much bigger difference than raid, but I ahve not used Ata-100 before. scsi drives might be faster in a raid system. But please correct me if I am wrong. If I use two ata-100 drives, and raid them. will that prove faster than my approach? In that case, what is the better MB to use if I choose to use raid on two ata-100 drives?
 
Back