I'm not surprised by this, it's SOP for most vendors out there. You filed a dispute and then a chargeback while your refund was pending, I'm sure that automatically flagged your account for fraud. In fact, I'm surprised that PayPal didn't freeze your account as well (that's happened to me before in a similar situation with PayPal). Though, the CSR should have been able to fix everything. I'm sure a followup call with someone above the CSR level could solve things, but I doubt you're interested in that.
In any event, I'm glad you eventually got your refund!
[edit]
My mistake, though the person that I quoted was the OP. Ignore
If that is directed at me you are probably not going to agree with this reply...but I don't really care what you make of it.
We all have varying degrees of tolerance for poor customer service, and we may define what constitues poor customer service differently. I noticed in the UPS thread you made something of a big deal out of the driver not ringing your bell when delivering a package. To that I would say that ringing your bell is not an integral part of the service. If UPS, FedEx, USPS are delivering packages that do not require a signature then they can leave them at the door and don't have to ring the bell or knock. So while I think you are making a mountain out of a mole hill over that it really doesn't matter what I think. If that makes you less than satisfied with the service then it is what it is. You probably can't do anything about it short of making sure all of your packages are sent with signature required.
In my case, there was something I could do about the problem I was having with NewEgg. I might agree that had I waited another day or two NewEgg might have resolved the situation on its own. The operative word here being
might. NewEgg did nothing to set my expectations of when I would receive my refund beyond what is stated in its policy. And the real issue for me was since I was not getting anything meaningful from customer service I did not trust that NewEgg was on top of the situation. The operative word here being trust. Since they lost my trust I took the actions I did, and have no regrets whatsoever.
The good news for me is that I have my refund. The bad news for NewEgg is they have been hit with a chargeback even though they posted the refund back to my PayPal account. This is a problem with my bank. When I filed the chargeback dispute with my bank I expressly asked what would happen if the merchant posted the disputed amount back to my account while the case was in process. I was told that I did not need to do anything: the temporary credit would be automatically reversed and the claim would be cancelled. So now NewEgg is going to be inconvenienced. I have already contacted PayPal this morning since they created a chargeback claim and I cancelled it. I will call my bank tomorrow morning and tell them that I have already received a refund from NewEgg in the disputed amount and will request that they cancel the chargeback claim.
I will also say that I don't have a shred of sympathy for NewEgg. This was their own doing, caused by poor customer service that was underscored by their failure to communicate effectively and set my expectations. An example of the latter would be "Your refund will post back to your original form of payment by December XX. An example
is not "We are working on your issue and hope to resolve it soon."
And to anyone who has a problem with me filing a PayPal dispute and a credit card chargeback concurrently...that's just too bad. They are not mutually exclusive. When it's your money at stake you can do as you see fit. Had I known that PayPal was going to give NewEgg 10 days to respond to the open case I would not have bothered with PayPal. Since I wasn't satisfied with the speed of PayPal's dispute resolution process I took the matter to my bank, and got a much more satisfying response. By the following morning, a temporary credit in the disputed amount was posted back to my account.
The argument put forward in this thread a few times that a chargeback = cardholder fraud lacks any merit whatsoever. Chargeback protection is subject to cardholder abuse, to be sure. But merchants also can and do abuse the system as well. That doesn't make every card holder and every merchant a perpetrator of fraud. If a merchant seriously wants to reduce its exposure to chargeback claims then it should take a very close look at how it is doing business and what it is specifically doing to satisfy customers when problems arise.