Newbie_Doo (Apr 26, 2001 09:20 a.m.):
The CUSL2 also has a version without onboard audio/video. I think it's the -C version. I'd ask Mr.B. I think he just got the Black Pearl of the same board without audio.
Nope, Slake just got that board.....looks like a nice one, too.
I'm running an Asus P3C2000 right now, which is NOT Celeron friendly. Not even an option for 66 FSB, and my C600 @ 1053 won't even post higher than 1008 MHz.
For a Celeron, I'd have to go with a BX chipset based board. Two names come to mind fairly quickly, Soyo and Abit. Both have several offerings that would work well.
I'd refrain from anything with a Via Apollo Pro 133 chipset. The 133A is a bit better, but the Pro 133 is notorious for low memory bandwidth.
Intel i820 chipsets will leave you saddled with the "glorious" (sarcasm? Hell yeah!) Memory Translator Hub, or expensive RDRAM. This was intel's idea to use this chipset with RAMBUS only, and when no one bought, they came up with the MTH, so you could use SDRAM. My P3C2000 has this, and while it works, it does indeed kill the memory bandwidth, too. Just not as bad as that Via chipset (first hand knowledge, here).
I've never had the i810 or i815 chipset on a motherboard, but from what I've read, these work well.
I'd still have to go with a BX based board here, though. Look into one of the following;
Soyo 6BA+III, +IV, or +100.
Abit BE6, BE6 II, BF6.
Read back thru all of the threads here in the "intel Motherboards" topic. Lots of good ideas on a choice.
The C600 @ 1053 I have was run at that speed on a Soyo 6BA+III board. It's weak link now, is the lack of ATA66/100 capability, which they added on the +IV and +100, respectively.
Good luck with the Celeron. Happy overclocking.
Mr B