You expect someone to make a guide for memory IC which is on the market for a couple of years. Just because it's a popular IC for new Ryzens, it doesn't mean it's required to cover the same topic again. It's also a very narrow topic which can be answered in 2 sentences so I see no point in writing guides (and I already answered to that in my previous posts).
Personally I skip Samsung B because it's boring and I've written at least 20 reviews about this IC. I don't know if you realize that no one is getting paid for reviews or guides here besides some review samples from time to time that they can keep (not even all). For me it's like I test RAM for fun. I spend my money on that too and sometimes I buy memory to show something interesting or I ask vendors to send me specific kits for tests (as I really don't earn much so it's hard for me to cover hardware for tests). Tests based on binning would require multiple memory kits, like really many to make a good comparison. It's simply not possible and for sure not worth to do considering already known results. I won't even mention how many hours would take really honest test with full comparison etc.
There were full Samsung B overclocking guides on extreme OC websties. I guess there is still something in the archives of hwbot forums. However, these guides were made for extreme overclockers who run RAM at 1.9V+. In some of my reviews are results up to 2V+ on Samsung B but if the memory kit is not worth it, then I simply don't push it.
I realize that this website is called Overclockers. However, I don't know if you noticed but overclocking is dying everywhere. From a large group of really extreme guys, we have only few left. Those who left know what they are doing and don't need guides. All others don't care or enjoy reading about these things but will never take part in extreme overclocking. So reviews or guides are more for enthusiasts and gamers but more detailed or more extreme OC is only when it's worth to do that or reviewer actually enjoy the product enough to spend additional time.
In many reviews I said to ask questions or suggest what do you want to see in reviews. I mean additional tests, some specific comparisons etc. I was asking that for years and not even one person suggested anything. All those who have questions, ask them in forum reviews or send me questions directly. For some reason, many forum users send me pms or emails with questions instead starting a new thread or post in the specific memory thread. Many make forum accounts only to send me questions via online form. One of reasons is probably like your issue right now - you can't find any good info in the web and posting on the forums will end only on wasting your time and reading answers of clueless people who won't even test anything before answering (I mean mostly other forums as I know that most people come here when they had bad experiences in other places).
I'm sorry if you took my replies as hostile. I'm not a native English speaker and I could use a wrong form. Anyway, the thread name and expectactions in the first post suggest that you want that someone write a guide what was in the form of demand rather than request.
I can agree with the fact that the web is flooded with random info which is often false. People repost other people's thoughts and never test anything on their own. Many create theories which aren't true or even close to reality. Later you can't find any info on even these popular, and for some reason, respected websites. More often, frontpage reviews are really poor quality and include nothing valuable. It's harder to find good info about products you want to buy. Youtube reviews are a joke and it's mostly flooded with "unpacking reviews" like anyone needs that.
