• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

Clarkdale vs Wolfdale - battle of the Dual Cores

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

Brolloks

Benching Senior on Siesta, Premium Member #8
Joined
Dec 26, 2006
Location
Land of Long Horns
So I started this thread (LINK) to show how the Clarkdale 32nm dual core does on the P55

I will take it a bit further and run a selected group of benchmarks against the Wolfdale who is the 45nm older brother of the -dale family of dual cores.

Over the next week we will see who will reign supreme in CPU benchmarks, 3D benchmarks as well as a few gaming benchmarks

For this excersise on the right corder we will have an Asus P7P55D Evo with an i5-650 and on the opposite corner we will have a Foxconn BlackOps with an E8500.

Both boards will host dual channel DDR3-1600 to rule out RAM speeds.

Hardware :

Clarkdale :

Motherboard - Asus P7P55D EVO

CPU - Intel i5-650 Overclocked to 4.333 Ghz (24 x 180.6)

RAM - 2 x 2 GB G.Skill DDR2-1600 at 1444 Mhz CL7-7-7-18

Wolfdale :

Motheboard - Foxconn BlackOps X48

CPU - Intel E8500 Overclocked to 4.3 Ghz (9.5 x 453 FSB)

RAM - 2 x 2 GB G.Skill DDR2-1600 at 1450 Mhz CL7-7-7-18

Common:

Video Card - Asus HD 4890 at 900/1000

RAM - 2 x 2 GB G.Skill DDR2-1600 at 1453 Mhz CL7-7-7-18

Kingston SNVP325 64 GB SSD
 

Attachments

  • ScreenHunter_01 Feb. 11 22.48.gif
    ScreenHunter_01 Feb. 11 22.48.gif
    79.5 KB · Views: 1,453
  • ScreenHunter_01 Feb. 12 14.42.gif
    ScreenHunter_01 Feb. 12 14.42.gif
    72.8 KB · Views: 1,395
  • ScreenHunter_10 Feb. 12 13.57.gif
    ScreenHunter_10 Feb. 12 13.57.gif
    17.3 KB · Views: 1,404
  • ScreenHunter_11 Feb. 12 13.58.gif
    ScreenHunter_11 Feb. 12 13.58.gif
    13.4 KB · Views: 1,383
Last edited:
Both, to see if it has an edge over the Wolfy

I think I know which to put my money on then
awesome.png
 
I hope Intel is looking at this thread.

Where's the natively clocked 4Ghz dualies?! Let turbo boost go up to 5Ghz Intel c'monnnnnn.

Anyways...always a pleasure brolloks. :D
 
Boy I need to see this.

Looking to build a temp rig to get me by (get me off this laptop) for about 6 months, then Ill give it to the wife.

Was thinking about an i3 or a used e8400. If i3 shows good improvement, might go with it.
 
Clock for Clock i give the edge to the C2D's in Single threaded apps because of it's abundant L2 Cache but in multi-threaded apps the C2D gets its *** kicked because of HT
 
The QPI link speed is extremely important in deciding the performance of the clarkdale. Try and raise it as high as possible.
 
A Summary of the two CPU's and the main differences:
 

Attachments

  • ScreenHunter_04 Feb. 08 16.16.gif
    ScreenHunter_04 Feb. 08 16.16.gif
    18.1 KB · Views: 1,657
I would turn off HT, just to see a true test between the two.. . Having the ability to do 4 threads instead of 2 may help in some instances... For a true clock for clock test, I would turn those off, then add them to see if it does in fact make a difference... My money is in the E8500. Cache has always proven to pull ahead of the rest... However, unless the i series is a complete redesign like the P4 (31 stage) vs the Core 2 (13 stage) series, we can safely say the E8500 will take the win...
 
I will run tests with and without HT, will be an interesting match for sure...tonight the Clarkdale benchies will be run :)
 
Before the results, my guess is that the Clarksdale should be faster overall (in terms of max. overclock with HT on).
 
Back