Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
That does remind me of the food marketing thing where the options are, for example, standard, large, XL. Not small/medium/large. Can't have negative connotations can we?Can't say I get the vibe that these companies are saying that, but, OK. Also, this is an enthusiast website so , the demographic here certainly disagrees...or at least wants premium, regardless if they can get away with something less. But, that's a people thing, to me.
If there is one thing I'd like all ram module makers to do, list the configuration! At minimum 1R or 2R, but knowing 1Rx8 or 1Rx16 could help too. JEDEC module datasheets have much higher chance of providing that than enthusiast ones.There's more information to glean from a processor name than RAM. I mean, GSkill Trident Z XxXXGB DDR5-xxxx CL-xx-xx-xx-xx, tells 99% of what users want to know (and should care about - 99.9% of PC users couldn't care less what the IC is, for example), and so do the processor naming conventions.
I could get onboard with this.At minimum 1R or 2R, but knowing 1Rx8 or 1Rx16 could help too
Not in today's world. It's 'snowing' everywhere.That does remind me of the food marketing thing where the options are, for example, standard, large, XL. Not small/medium/large. Can't have negative connotations can we?
I couldn't care less about the ranks/banks (id consider myself an enthusiast). There's lower-hanging fruit than that...If there is one thing I'd like all ram module makers to do, list the configuration! At minimum 1R or 2R, but knowing 1Rx8 or 1Rx16 could help too. JEDEC module datasheets have much higher chance of providing that than enthusiast ones.
Curiois...what say you about AMD's naming conventions?
Do you think Intel are targeting that age range specifically? I'd argue that range has relatively poor buying power, so the optimal range would be older. Maybe 30's-40's. More income, more likelihood of being in a decision making position at work. I wonder if there is any research out there on buyer demographics.
I really don't get the hate. Not to say I like it,
You're living in the past! This NEXT generation is screwed financially... But the 15-25 year-olds that exist today are MUCH better off than most of us ever were. They've all got tech jobs that didn't even exist when we were that age. (Chicago alone is FILLED with them)
We did... and I, I thought I mentioned the new Core theme at that time as well (July). I don't think Intel's is anymore confusing than AMDs.I think you went over AMD's naming conventions with me once...
I don't think anyone disagrees with your first sentence here. But, I'm not sure how it could get much easier.The emphasis should be on making the naming as simple, and more importantly, as CONCISE as possible.
Video game franchises have done MUCH better with this: Most of them just go by year.
What's wrong with that? "AMD Ryzen 2024." DONE. You could throw a 5, 7, and 9 after that if you want. So like "Ryzen 7 2024."
Then you have everything you need.
How many high school kids are working tech jobs and making bank?
I could understand some in college during an internship and then if they land a good job after graduation could be pulling in near/6figures+ but it isn't happening for a lot of folks in that age range. And that's looking at 22-25+ year olds with the possibility of staying in college for a post-graduate degree like a masters.
We did... and I, I thought I mentioned the new Core theme at that time as well (July). I don't think Intel's is anymore confusing than AMDs.
I don't think anyone disagrees with your first sentence here. But, I'm not sure how it could get much easier.
There are simply too many SKUs to do something as simple as that. If there was only Ryzen 5/7/9 and Intel i3/5/7/9 (3 and 4 SKUs, respectively), you'd have a winner. But, there are unlocked SKUs (and not), lower powered SKUs, and that's only talking about the desktop segment (not mobile, not servers). So..........what, you add on more letters or numbers or both to discern?
There will be >>1000 working in some fast food joint for every financially successful "creator". The vast majority will never earn anything from it or earn so little it doesn't make a dent.Not to mention the fact that there are completely RIDICULOUS ways for even teenagers to make money nowadays. There's TikTok, and YouTube, and Twitch... Instagram... As I said: You're thinking in the past. It's not some kid working at McDonald's or doing a paper route or something anymore.
There will be >>1000 working in some fast food joint for every financially successful "creator". The vast majority will never earn anything from it or earn so little it doesn't make a dent.