No doubt about that. But since I just bought my 780 Classy HCs and haven't even broken the shrink wrap I don't need the step up if I really wanted the 780 Ti. I could just send them back for a full refund since I am within the 30 day return window.
I know to some people the Ti will make all the difference in the world. But it just isn't that important to me to own a card that, at least this week, is the fastest card on the planet. No matter how you slice it, Nvidia's value proposition on new product has not been anything to write home about. They give you performance, to be sure, but they extract a hefty sum for it from their customers. With Nvidia there is no such thing as a free lunch.
No argument there either. When I decided to upgrade about three weeks ago I was looking at over $800 for a GTX 780 Classy HC and thought to myself that I must be absolutely out of my mind to be thinking about spending over $2,400 for three GPUs. That is more than double what I paid for my triple SLI GTX 570 set up over two years ago. Hopefully a triple SLI Nvidia setup won't cost me $4,800 in another two years. I think Nvidia is really pushing pricing...but as long as people are willing to fork over the cash they will keep trying to push the price boundaries. When Titan came out I really hoped that gamers would stay the hell away from it. A $1,000 video card is workstation/professional graphics territory, not gamer pricing. I think AMD has at least that part of it right.
True dat. Though the price drop was not as great on the higher end cards (ex. the GTX 780 Classy HC dropped only $129).