Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
While I was looking for definite information about OC'ing my 8700 found that people insist on going straight to 1.35V and sticking there. My personal experience is that excess voltage is bad too for overclocking.
Loafing thru many different threads noticed this, all go blindly and stick to 1.35V. Question is... why? My 8700 is happy at x50 multi with AVX -2 cache goes up at x46 multi too at 1.275V. Found other 8600K that roar at similar voltages too. VCSSA/VCCIO too can help to tame temps (everything helps a bit).
Have you tried to go lower (i.e: 1.3V), test... (1 Hour of Prime95) if passes down a notch and still? (I know that's a long and tedious process but wondering if I found an unicorn with my 8700K).
Yes. I started testing 4.7ghz from 1.25v and up. It would bsod on anything lower than 1.33, at which it didn't crash, but one core failed a few minutes into the test. On 1.34, one core would fail at around 12 minutes, and on 1.35, at 50 minutes. I have left it testing at 1.36v while I'm at work. If one core fails again, I'll just lower the frequency to 4.6, since temps are starting to get hot at this point.
Btw, HWMonitor was only displaying up to 1.28v before I left. I have no idea if it's just not reading the voltage correctly (I checked with core temp and it showed the same info) or if my mobo has a strange way of working with voltages.
Quite possible your motherboard suffers from V_Droop which causes the voltage to drop under load. Look for LLC settings in your BIOS this should help level the voltage out and possibly allow you to lower the initial voltage.
I
Would you recommend any of these boards?
MSI Z370 GAMING PLUS
ASUS TUF Z370 PLUS GAMING
I might consider selling the one I have and get one of those.
Load-Line Calibration (LLC) is a mechanism offered to overclockers designed to compensate for large voltage droops when a CPU or GPU is under increased load. The mechanism attempts to compensate for the sudden sagging in voltage by preemptively applying additional voltage. The LLC, which is part of the voltage regulator module, was introduced in order to ensure a more smooth voltage delivery when the CPU/GPU is both idle as well as under heavy load, thereby eliminating related system instability or crashes on overclocked systems. This feature is aimed at overclockers as for normal systems the LLC is usually disabled by default because typical Vdroop is part of the system specification. https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/load-line_calibration
Why is your CPU fan showing max RPM at less than a grand? No wonder your temps are high.
Does the CPU fan speed spin full speed when over 80c with default fan speed in BIOS? I don't like windows software to control fan speed I would remove it.
I was wondering what did you do to reset the BIOS? When stress testing anyting under 90c is fine. I go up to 95c maximum with prime95.
No problem I use optimized defaults a lot I'm always messing with my BIOS all the time. The problem you had sounds confusing. So your saying with default BIOS settings the CPU fan would not run full speed 80c? The reason I'm asking is I'm thinking of purchasing the Z370 HD3 and it has the same fan controller and I don't wan't to set any fan profiles I like to leave it stock.
The default settings *should* make the CPU fan run full speed at 65c, at least that's what the default curve says it should do. However, in practice, the fan controller doesn't take into account the actual temperature of the CPU to control the speed, but a temperature labeled as "System 1", which seems to be the lower part of my mobo. Since this part doesn't get as hot the CPU, the CPU fan never goes beyond 900-1000 RPM whatever the actual CPU temp is. If it was reading the right temperature, it would go up to 1600 RPM as soon as the CPU reached 65c.
I have no idea if this is an issue everyone is having or if it's just my board.