Here is a comparison I did several months ago. I used RAM with BH-5 chips in the 2.4C using the 5:4 ratio and tight timings. The 2.8C and 2.8E both had PC4000 RAM and used the 1:1 ratio. Anyway, that should give you a good idea of how they stack up. The Prescott runs lots hotter and needs watercooling to get high overclocks.
COMPARISON OF 2.4C, 2.8C and 2.8E OVERCLOCKED TO 3.4 GIG
Sandra CPU ALU:
2.4C/3.4=10722, 2.8C/3.4=10363, 2.8E/3.4=9998
Sandra CPU FPU:
2.4C/3.4=2941/6413, 2.8C/3.4=2947/6469, 2.8E/3.4=2783/5864
Sandra memory bandwidth:
2.4C/3.4=6166/6160, 2.8C/3.4=5876/5791, 2.8E/3.4=5919/5919
PCmark2002 CPU
2.4C/3.4=8436, 2.8C/3.4=8437, 2.8E/3.4=7190
PCmark2002 memory
2.4C/3.4=11450, 2.8C/3.4=10955, 2.8E/3.4=12549
PCmark2002 HDD
2.4C/3.4=1379, 2.8C/3.4=1299, 2.8E/3.4=1279
PCmark2004
2.4C/3.4=5323, 2.8C/3.4=5259, 2.8E/3.4=5222
3Dmark2001 (Radeon 9700 Pro at default speed and settings)
2.4C/3.4=17056, 2.8C/3.4=17138, 2.8E/3.4=17129