for anybody folding with morgan or slower tbird

[res0r9lm]

anybody folding with a morgan or slow tbird would you mind listing your mhz and how fast your folding make sure to tell what protien you folded to get that time. It's my thoery that the morgans will fold a little better than the tbirds at the same speed.

 

[Newbie_Doo]

T-Bird 1000@1333 (Stable-no errors)

ProteinAg29A 11.50 M (690 Sec)

proteinAg29aNat 11.54 Min / Frame

In contrast, my XP1600+ (1400MHz) turns the same proteinag29a in 10.59 M/Frame (636 Seconds)

 

[Kendan]

Mine is a duron 1.1 @ 1.232 on a K7S5A with 256 DDR.

Here are some log shots I hope it helps. If you want some more proteins just ask and I will dig further back. I also have the rig in my sig. if you want those just let me know.

Client : Duron 1.1: //Duron 1100/FOLDING@HOME
Core : Version 2.41 (Jan 22, 2002)
Protein : proteinA
Frames : 100
Workunit : 08
Atoms : 601
Steps : 500000
Server IP :
Completed : Between Thu Apr 4 03:56:59 2002 and Thu Apr 4 03:58:29 2002
Refresh at : 90 sec.
Frame Time : 12.23 min. ( 734 sec. )
Total Time : 1222.35 min. ( 73341 sec. )

Client : Duron 1.1: //Duron 1100/FOLDING@HOME
Core : Version 2.41 (Jan 22, 2002)
Protein : bba5_build_ext
Frames : 100
Workunit : 05
Atoms : 260
Steps : 500000
Server IP :
Completed : Between Thu Mar 28 19:48:34 2002 and Thu Mar 28 19:50:04 2002
Refresh at : 90 sec.
Frame Time : 2.00 min. ( 120 sec. )
Total Time : 198.97 min. ( 11938 sec. )


Client : Duron 1.1: //Duron 1100/FOLDING@HOME
Core : Version 2.41 (Jan 22, 2002)
Protein : NativeBBA5
Frames : 100
Workunit : 00
Atoms : 260
Steps : 500000
Server IP :
Completed : Between Tue Mar 26 10:31:47 2002 and Tue Mar 26 10:33:17 2002
Refresh at : 90 sec.
Frame Time : 1.93 min. ( 116 sec. )
Total Time : 191.55 min. ( 11493 sec. )


Wow did I have to go far back in the log to dig out a GNRA Hairpin.


Client : Duron 1.1: //Duron 1100/FOLDING@HOME
Core : Version 2.41 (Jan 22, 2002)
Protein : GNRA hairpin
Frames : 100
Workunit : 02
Atoms : 389
Steps : 500000
Server IP :
Completed : Between Sat Mar 23 22:21:58 2002 and Sat Mar 23 22:23:28 2002
Refresh at : 90 sec.
Frame Time : 5.16 min. ( 310 sec. )
Total Time : 514.50 min. ( 30870 sec. )

Fold on!!!

 

[res0r9lm]

looks pretty even between the morgan, tbird, and xp taking into account the difference in clock speeds.

 

[Mr B]

My 1.0 @ 1400 T-bird was turning in Protien A's at just under 10 minutes a frame.

 

[res0r9lm]

looks like people trying to fold with the old kt133 would be better off with a 1.2 morgan unless you could find a good deal on a tbird and kt 133a and higher would be better off with one of the new stepping of the xp atleast from economic stand point.

 

[Mr B]

looks like people trying to fold with the old kt133 would be better off with a 1.2 morgan unless you could find a good deal on a tbird and kt 133a and higher would be better off with one of the new stepping of the xp atleast from economic stand point.

Obviously, any would be faster than this P/// 700 @933 of mine...lol.

 

[res0r9lm]

Obviously, any would be faster than this P/// 700 @933 of mine...lol.

hey it could be worse you could have a AMD k2

 

[Roger24]

proteinA takes about 19 minutes per frame on this computer.

 

[Mr B]

hey it could be worse you could have a AMD k2

I sold that to sickboy before I got into Folding....

(I got $5 and a Delta 38 for it...)

 

[David]

Tbird 1100 @ 1166:

ProteinA types - approx 14 or 15mins/frame
NativeBBA5s - aprrox 2.5mins
bba5_build_ext - approx 2 mins
GNRA hairpins - approx 6 to 8 mins, depends.


res0r9lm: I have a k6-2 folding for this weekend, slow as hell

 

[JetMech]

Duron 1.2 @ 1350

Protein Anat - 11.06 min/frame
ProteinAg29aNat - 11.13 min/frame
NativeBBA5 - 1.79 mim/frame

Athlon T-Bird 1.4 @ 1450

Protein Anat - 10.39 min/frame = 0.67min faster than Duron
ProteinAg29aNat - 10.44 min/frame = 0.69min faster than Duron
NativeBBA5 - 1.77 min/frame

XP 1800+ @ 2000+

Protein Anat - 8.85 min/frame = 1.54mins faster than Tbird
ProteinAg29aNat - 8.86 min/frame = 1.58mins faster than Tbird
NativeBBA5 - 1.45 mim/frame

 

[Mr B]

(quoteing jetmech)
---------------------------------------------------------------------

XP 1800+ @ 2000+

Protein Anat - 8.85 min/frame = 1.54mins faster than Tbird
ProteinAg29aNat - 8.86 min/frame = 1.58mins faster than Tbird
NativeBBA5 - 1.45 mim/frame

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hmmm......Curious...My XP is a bit faster than yours (1.7 to your 1.67), but folds just a bit slower. (I'm doing Protien A frames about 30-40 seconds slower) Must be all of the other stuff I have running and use the rig for. Is the XP your main rig, and what mobo is it on?

Mine is on a MSI K7T266 Pro (KT266)...

B.

 

[res0r9lm]

(quoteing jetmech)
---------------------------------------------------------------------

XP 1800+ @ 2000+

Protein Anat - 8.85 min/frame = 1.54mins faster than Tbird
ProteinAg29aNat - 8.86 min/frame = 1.58mins faster than Tbird
NativeBBA5 - 1.45 mim/frame

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hmmm......Curious...My XP is a bit faster than yours (1.7 to your 1.67), but folds just a bit slower. (I'm doing Protien A frames about 30-40 seconds slower) Must be all of the other stuff I have running and use the rig for. Is the XP your main rig, and what mobo is it on?

Mine is on a MSI K7T266 Pro (KT266)...

B.

mr b there isn't going to be alot of difference between your xp and jetmech's xp if you weren't using it at the time also there can be quite a difference between each wu even though there the same protien. check out the native bba5 and you'll see a prime example.

Client : AK31 ( Tbird@ 1654): C:/WINDOWS/Desktop/Folding
Core : Version 2.41 (Jan 22, 2002)
Protein : proteinAg29aNat
Frames : 100
Workunit : 04
Atoms : 602
Steps : 500000
Server IP :
Completed : Between Wed Apr 3 00:24:43 2002 and Wed Apr 3 00:24:53 2002
Refresh at : 10 sec.
Frame Time : 8.87 min. ( 532 sec. )
Total Time : 887.32 min. ( 53239 sec.

Client : AK31 ( Tbird@ 1654): C:/WINDOWS/Desktop/Folding
Core : Version 2.41 (Jan 22, 2002)
Protein : proteinAg29a
Frames : 100
Workunit : 07
Atoms : 602
Steps : 500000
Server IP :
Completed : Between Thu Apr 4 20:49:11 2002 and Thu Apr 4 20:49:21 2002
Refresh at : 10 sec.
Frame Time : 8.87 min. ( 532 sec. )
Total Time : 886.88 min. ( 53213 sec. )

Client : AK31 ( Tbird@ 1654): C:/WINDOWS/Desktop/Folding
Core : Version 2.41 (Jan 22, 2002)
Protein : NativeBBA5
Frames : 100
Workunit : 00
Atoms : 260
Steps : 500000
Server IP :
Completed : Between Sun Mar 24 02:06:40 2002 and Sun Mar 24 02:06:50 2002
Refresh at : 10 sec.
Frame Time : 1.34 min. ( 80 sec. )
Total Time : 134.13 min. ( 8048 sec. )

 

[JetMech]

(quoteing jetmech)
---------------------------------------------------------------------

XP 1800+ @ 2000+

Protein Anat - 8.85 min/frame = 1.54mins faster than Tbird
ProteinAg29aNat - 8.86 min/frame = 1.58mins faster than Tbird
NativeBBA5 - 1.45 mim/frame

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hmmm......Curious...My XP is a bit faster than yours (1.7 to your 1.67), but folds just a bit slower. (I'm doing Protien A frames about 30-40 seconds slower) Must be all of the other stuff I have running and use the rig for. Is the XP your main rig, and what mobo is it on?

Mine is on a MSI K7T266 Pro (KT266)...

B.

My main rig is a P4 @ 2.0. The XP gets minimal use, mainly checking stats. The motherboard is an Abit KR7A-RAID. Memory is 256MB Corsair PC 2400 C2. Video is a VisionTek Xtasy 5632 GTS/V 32MB. If I can ever figure out why I can't get 150FSB out of this configuration I'll be one happy camper.