I'm not really sure how Google could even be marginally considered a team. Team=active competition. If all there is to Google's team is a toolbar then something is drastically wrong. Someday I'd love to see
[email protected] included in big name OS dist pkgs, however I wouldn't consider "Team Linux" or "Team MS" valid. They'd crush the spirit of competition (as Google has) and function as an anon effort. Would it be feasible to group these anon teams separately from the standard teams?
Basic criteria; how is a "team" defined by
[email protected]? I suppose if Google meets the standard criteria then our vocalizations are indeed sour grapes. However, competition need not be squahed by the mega-folders. Instead of team score being a simple tallying of scores, what about ranking based on each group's standard deviation? Well, I'm sure someone could come up with a mathmatical formula that would give all participants a healthy competitive incentive and equal footing.
