- Joined
- Apr 29, 2002
- Thread Starter
- #21
So far, so good. My PC is also doubles as a 700W space heater.
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
So far, so good. My PC is also doubles as a 700W space heater.
So what's the going PPD for a GTX 970 and the W/PPD?
260-270K (p9201 and p9411) per day for 350W full bore. Drops considerably on p8018, etc. Works for me.
Looks as if F@H is trying to use the GPU, but it won't play nice for some reason...
Very odd that the GPU artifacts when you feed it more volts, never heard of that before...
Would you be able to put that GPU in another rig and try folding on it? If it's fine, then we know the card is still okay.
Drop the core speed a bit more. Shut down the FAH client, kill off any FAH processes (core17, etc) after you've shut it off. Restart the client. When you see that in afterburner, the client has failed on just that core.
Sorry they are being frustrating for you.
Is this just the GTX 970 card or the system + card?
Both my cards are doing ~150kPPD for ~300W just for the cards. I imagine the total system cost is ~500W.
System plus a single GTX 970 FTW OCed card. Looking at my other system with two GTX 970 Superclocked cards (only factory overclocked) it is pulling 389W (working p8018 and p9201) according to the trusty old Kill-A-Watt P3.
Looks like I'll have to upgrade pretty soon. I've gotten addicted to the higher PPD, but I have to cut power usage. Figure a couple GTX 970 cards should be good for ~500+kPPD for less power usage.
Yes. Unless it happens to be two p8018 units running for 80K per day and bumps it up to 404W. Peaks and valleys.
Sounds like a real sucky WU. Too bad I can't run AMD cards in Linux to avoid them.