- Joined
- May 1, 2003
- Location
- Seattle
OMG that sounds painful 
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Super Nade said:You are mistaken. Every point counts! With my hardware, I don't have a score to rave about, but hey it helps the team.
PS#
If you say that you don't have a nice score, I'll beat you over the head with a Ramen-noodle.![]()
Gautam said:Those are real nice X1900CF clocks for 06, Wastrel.What cooling is that? Seems like you got a very nice pair.
![]()
oh cool... i wanna see a picture of your rads!!!!Wastrel said:lol Indeed Maxi. Its ok if you hit me with Ramens SN, just dont throw a nade my way.
Thanks Gautam.
First off I kinda flooded the 3DMark03 thread. Wont happen again. I made a post over there about my cooling.Ready to get underwhelmed?
http://www.ocforums.com/showpost.php?p=4801379&postcount=18
GPU loop has a 400 L/hr pump, (2+1)3x120 External Rad with two 94CFM 120x25 fans in push/pull and two 54 CFM pushing. 3/8 ID tubing. Graphics Cards with 24/7 clocks (1.55 Vcore) heat up to 50C and with benching clocks (1.575 Vcore) 55C. They idle at 37C.
CPU loop has dual 90L /hr pumps, 5x120 external Rad with five 120x25 54CFM fans pushing. 1/4 IDtubing. With CPU Vcore at 1.648 temps wont get over 40C under full load, its usually around 38C while gaming idles at 27-28.
g0dM@n said:oh cool... i wanna see a picture of your rads!!!!
also, wouldn't it be better (or have you thought about) to have the 5x120 for the x1900s instead? or maybe you don't feel like undoing it all (i know i wouldn't... i've become lazy lately when it comes to my PC)
either way, sexy setup. and i noticed from the pix that u don't have ramsinks on the ram chips under the waterblock. if you need, lemme know... i got lots of extra sinks i could probably spare at no cost.![]()
El<(')>Maxi said:Hey trick, we can't accept scores without an ORB link or at the very minimum a full screen capture showing test details, CPU-Z, and card clocks. Also you need to read the first post in this thread so you know how to correctly post a score in a hwbot thread, you're completely missing the hwbot tag. I'll do my best to help you with these if you have any questions.
The project id is not valid - please check the URL.
What the hell is that ? good god man I had to jump through hoops just to get this stupid orb now I have some more hoops to jump through? WTF???sno.lcn said:![]()
You also need to do the hwbot tags as well![]()
Format it just like the rest of the posts in this thread. The first post tells ya how to do it. I was a bit confused at first toombot said:- format your score as follows: [hwbot] score - system description [/hwbot]
- try not to use abbreviations. eg. 'opteron 146' is ok, '146' is too short.
- format processor overclock like 'A64 3200+ @ 2850Mhz' or 'A64 3200+ @ 2.85Ghz', format videocard speed as 'R9800 @ 350/333Mhz'.
- allowed score formats: '12345' or '12345 3dmarks' or '12345 marks'
- don't use text layout (bold, italic) or hyperlinks in your system description.
OK so will this let me publish the score when it is fixed or not ? because this is so lamed]g[ts said:the orb isnt updated to accept the new rev of the bench. if you do a search for scores of this rev, there are no scores up. Tis not your problem. its the orbs.
IMHO it looks like a descent score for your rig. compares well to other scores (looking at older rev scores ofcourse)trickson said:OK so will this let me publish the score when it is fixed or not ? because this is so lame. but I have to say my score really rocks for what I am running .
what say you all?
cool Thank You .d]g[ts said:IMHO it looks like a descent score for your rig. compares well to other scores (looking at older rev scores ofcourse)
As soon as futuremark straightes out the issue. you should be able to publish your score.