Hi all,
I recently bought a nice Gigabyte Z77X-UD3H board, which let me overclock my processor.
So far everything is working out very nicely. In fact, I've set the multiplier to 16, so at idle it's actually using ~8 watts. Turbo Boost setting is 42, 40, 38, 37 for 1, 2, 3, 4-core utilisation, respectively.
I'm using a Deepcool tower heatsink with 3 heatpipes and a Gentle Typhoon strapped on it, so it's cooled very nicely, with 40* idle in 30* ambient.
My question is, now that I've got the clocks setup like this, I'm seeing per core temperature fluctuate between 40 and 50+ *C very quickly. On average it's still pulling less than 10W, but there are many spikes from 1.6 GHz to 3.7+ GHz due to background processes and whatever. Should I be concerned about the significant fluctuations in core temperature and how it might cause extra stress due to expansion/contraction? Would it be more advisable to constantly run it at a baseline 3.7 GHz instead?
I recently bought a nice Gigabyte Z77X-UD3H board, which let me overclock my processor.
So far everything is working out very nicely. In fact, I've set the multiplier to 16, so at idle it's actually using ~8 watts. Turbo Boost setting is 42, 40, 38, 37 for 1, 2, 3, 4-core utilisation, respectively.
I'm using a Deepcool tower heatsink with 3 heatpipes and a Gentle Typhoon strapped on it, so it's cooled very nicely, with 40* idle in 30* ambient.
My question is, now that I've got the clocks setup like this, I'm seeing per core temperature fluctuate between 40 and 50+ *C very quickly. On average it's still pulling less than 10W, but there are many spikes from 1.6 GHz to 3.7+ GHz due to background processes and whatever. Should I be concerned about the significant fluctuations in core temperature and how it might cause extra stress due to expansion/contraction? Would it be more advisable to constantly run it at a baseline 3.7 GHz instead?