http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,...nds-on-test-of-the-six-core-Gulftown/Reviews/
Surprisingly, it consumes less power than Phenom II X4 965 BE and i7 920.
Surprisingly, it consumes less power than Phenom II X4 965 BE and i7 920.
-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
i9 BenchMarks
- Thread starter Spyguy
- Start date
- Joined
- May 26, 2004
- Location
- Japan, Tokyo, Ueno.
PClabs.pl preview or at least what has been saved from it after intel asked them to remove the article.
At full load it needs only 10W more than a Deneb or Yorkfield, but 25W less than a bloomfield with 6 cores and 12 threads and still the coolest processor out there.
At full load it needs only 10W more than a Deneb or Yorkfield, but 25W less than a bloomfield with 6 cores and 12 threads and still the coolest processor out there.
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2008
- Location
- Birmingham, UK
If only...
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2009
- Location
- California
Blue,
How do you know about the price? Will there be more than one model, like with the i7's when they were introduced?
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2005
- Location
- Vancouver, Canada
I wonder if it will consume an equal or less amount of power at the same clockspeed at 3.33ghz.
Last edited:
quite simple really.. if you look at the chart you will see that under name.. it its Core i9-xxx XE which basicaly means it's an extreme chip.. and well the price tag on those are what we know.. and to be honest i doubt that there will be i9's for the general public yet.. don't get me wrong i hope i'm wrong since it would be lovely to have one of these for me to render with.. but doubtfull
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2009
i expect these beasts to overclock up to 5ghz on water i mean we have seen some i7 920 D0 at 4.5ghz and it's a 45nm chip
i9 is 32nm which means less heat more ghz and less vcore (but since there are +2 cores maybe it will be the same ? )
if only i could get on of these =((
i9 is 32nm which means less heat more ghz and less vcore (but since there are +2 cores maybe it will be the same ? )
if only i could get on of these =((
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2009
- Location
- California
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2009
- Location
- Brandon Mississippi
Good Lord, 50% faster than the i7????
My and my 920 feel so outdated now... AND I JUST BUILT IT LAST CHRISTMAS
My and my 920 feel so outdated now... AND I JUST BUILT IT LAST CHRISTMAS
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2006
looks awesome but kinda of worried about these game benchmarks. that mean we are hitting a bottleneck and the cpu's not being that bottleneck anymore?
I really want to upgrade to a Core I7 but afraid this will come out at a lower price once i do upgrade to a I7
I really want to upgrade to a Core I7 but afraid this will come out at a lower price once i do upgrade to a I7
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2006
i want to, but i would have to get a new motherboard, ram and the cpu. i want to go 1366 slot I7 and that will run me 670 with the stuff i picked out and the only reason i want to get a faster cpu is that i rip blu rays, as of now, it takes me 12 hours to encode a 1080P blu ray rip to a MKV file on my E6750. i know that getting a Core I7 will help out the encoding time BIG TIME. but i dont want to spend 700 + shipped to do this.
i was going to upgrade my computer for Christmas (and my birthday is on the 17th of December) but i decided to try to get a Nice HDTV to replace my crappy 20" flatscreen.
im thinking about just upgrading my current cpu to a Q9550 so i dont have to replace my mobo and ram but i find spending 230 a little much when the Core I5 750 is 199.
i may just end up buying the Q9550 at some point. maybe ill get lucky and get $ from my grandparents for Christmas and my birthday
lol
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2009
i want to, but i would have to get a new motherboard, ram and the cpu. i want to go 1366 slot I7 and that will run me 670 with the stuff i picked out and the only reason i want to get a faster cpu is that i rip blu rays, as of now, it takes me 12 hours to encode a 1080P blu ray rip to a MKV file on my E6750. i know that getting a Core I7 will help out the encoding time BIG TIME. but i dont want to spend 700 + shipped to do this.
i was going to upgrade my computer for Christmas (and my birthday is on the 17th of December) but i decided to try to get a Nice HDTV to replace my crappy 20" flatscreen.
im thinking about just upgrading my current cpu to a Q9550 so i dont have to replace my mobo and ram but i find spending 230 a little much when the Core I5 750 is 199.
i may just end up buying the Q9550 at some point. maybe ill get lucky and get $ from my grandparents for Christmas and my birthday
Do NOT GO FOR Qxxxx cpus, they are nearly outdated by now (and they will soon be), btw isn't there a way to rip bluerays with the gpu? maybe i am confusing it with encoding Oo
btw it's strange that games run 2fps higher with the i9, strange how 2 cores more can do that since games aren't really multithreaded that much Oo
maybe those 2 extra cores take some load of background apps and game runs more freely but 2 fps isn't worth going from i7 to i9
i would take that beast only because i know it would overclock better and because i need the extra clock to compile my stupid programs in less time
some would say there is no need for all that power while programming, but in a code i did a loop where a friend had to restart his pc while i could still do things
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2006
im just hoping that the bios that are on my motherboard now will support the 45nm quad core cpu's. Abit went out of busness but i know they have bios that support 45 nm chips dual and quad but flashing the bios on my motherboard is a pain in the *** and i dont want to **** it up.
