At first I was excited because physics score looks excellent on TR, then I looked at GT scores... It looks like this bench needs as much CPU frequency as you can give it to help the GT's. I will test this on an Intel platform shortly.
This is a excellent Bench to ask as we have Intel/AMD 4c/8t ~ 32c/64t being used on the PT test. I have a i9-10940x (14c/28t) running this test. I get a PT score of 26 with HT on and 25 with it off Johan45's AMD 12c/24t beats mine by over 2x (PT = 60), Even Freeagent's i7-3770k (4c/8t PT = 36.84) beats me I will admit that I have the memory setup for benching. If you change the amount of memory to use at start-up to 4GB to can run some wicked timings IE Quad channel @ 3800 CL 12-11-11-28/220 1T
Could this be my problem?? I will have to continue checking/benching just the PT part to find out. MB used EVGA x299 w/i9-10940x BIOS ver 1.21
Pretty disappointed by physics / combined, but I'm guessing that Zen+ is just outclassed in IPC here. I could drop some cores and push for 4.4GHz but I really don't think the 100Mhz will be worth the effort. Tests like this make me wonder what impact Zen2 would have on old engines like DCS. I guess $200 isn't that much to find out.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.