The article didn't say if the benchmarks were done with the PATA or SATA version of the maxtor drive.batboy said:Baraka, here is a review about the new SATA Maxtors.
http://www6.tomshardware.com/storage/20030314/index.html
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
The article didn't say if the benchmarks were done with the PATA or SATA version of the maxtor drive.batboy said:Baraka, here is a review about the new SATA Maxtors.
http://www6.tomshardware.com/storage/20030314/index.html
ViolaDude said:do any of the canterwoods have sata for IDE?
batboy said:V-dude, as near as I can tell, the RAID is only for the Serial ATA, but you can convert a standard IDE drive to serial with an adapter (I think). It just won't run as fast as a true SATA drive of course.
pacino said:P4C800, hands down... IC7 is a yummy... I'm going P4C800 personally
Rasputin'sLiver said:
hi PACINO! good to see you again. i should have figured that the allure of canterwood would bring you back, as it did for me. i lurked for a couple of months not really wanting anything new until the new chipsets hit! time to play again!
pacino said:
What's up Rasie! .. Good to c u 2 .. It sure did, got a better job now, so more $$$$ to burn! hehehe
I haven't seen any indication of this. All of the SATA vs PATA benchmarks I've seen show comparable performance.batboy said:The new Maxtor SATA drives are significantly faster than the current ATA133 IDE drives.