- Joined
- Nov 10, 2004
- Location
- Washington DC
I have been lurking here for about a year, and I have to say that this place is awesome. The information here is great, and everyone seems willing to help.
After reading posts here since January, I have finally decided to (gulp) try and build my first system. I am not a hardcore gamer but I will use the computer to play, and also for digital photography/image post-processing. I will not OC my system at first. I will start by building a stable system, get to know it well, keep reading these forums, and after a few months maybe try my hand at some not-too-agressive overclocks. I will be loading WinXp on the machine, as I have some software that I need that will only run under WinXp SP2.
After lots of research I decided to go with the Athlon 64 3500+ Venice (s939). Since I don't need SLI I chose the nForce 4 Ultra chipset. My next step is to select a mobo.
I have done lots of reading and I am down to either the EPOX 9NPA+Ultra or the DFI LANParty UT nF4 Ultra-D. There have been lots of reviews of these boards and many comparisons (including a recent thread in this forum asking about the differences between these boards) but none have answered the specific questions I have.
I have read a lot about the DFI, and it seems that since it has so many options (a Good Thing for an experienced user, but maybe too confusing for a newbie?), it requires a lot of "tweaking" of the BIOS to get it going and stable (I have read a lot, for example, about tweaking the memory settings). As a complete newbie this is something I should probably avoid. So, here is my first question: Does the DFI really require lots of tweaking at the start? Or can you use the mobo with stock settings with no problems if I don't want to OC my system at first? Or is it a matter of luck, depending on the rest of the system?
The Epox has received top reviews at Anandtech and sems like an excellent, stable board with very good OC potential. It is also cheaper, so right now it is my top choice. The only thing holding me back from getting the Epox is this review at Anandtech. The review says that the board's layout is somewhat awkward. It complains, for example, about the placement of the ATX 24-pin and 12V 4-pin power connectors between the CPU and the rear panel (so that the 24 pin cable will have to go around or over the CPU or memory, possibly blocking air flow) and the position of the IDE connectors just behind the PCIe slot, so that the IDE cables may prevent a long card from seating properly. In comparison, the layout of the DFI seems great. Is this really a big deal for a newbie trying to put together a system? I have never built a system before, so I'm not sure if these layout issues are a big deal, or just a minor nuisance.
So, assuming the answer to both questions is 'yes' (yes, the DFI may require lots of tweaking to get it going, and yes, the layout issues of the Epox might be a big problem), which of these would be the "lesser of two evils" for a newbie?
Thanks in advance for any help, and thanks for all the excellent info you guys provide here!

After reading posts here since January, I have finally decided to (gulp) try and build my first system. I am not a hardcore gamer but I will use the computer to play, and also for digital photography/image post-processing. I will not OC my system at first. I will start by building a stable system, get to know it well, keep reading these forums, and after a few months maybe try my hand at some not-too-agressive overclocks. I will be loading WinXp on the machine, as I have some software that I need that will only run under WinXp SP2.
After lots of research I decided to go with the Athlon 64 3500+ Venice (s939). Since I don't need SLI I chose the nForce 4 Ultra chipset. My next step is to select a mobo.
I have done lots of reading and I am down to either the EPOX 9NPA+Ultra or the DFI LANParty UT nF4 Ultra-D. There have been lots of reviews of these boards and many comparisons (including a recent thread in this forum asking about the differences between these boards) but none have answered the specific questions I have.
I have read a lot about the DFI, and it seems that since it has so many options (a Good Thing for an experienced user, but maybe too confusing for a newbie?), it requires a lot of "tweaking" of the BIOS to get it going and stable (I have read a lot, for example, about tweaking the memory settings). As a complete newbie this is something I should probably avoid. So, here is my first question: Does the DFI really require lots of tweaking at the start? Or can you use the mobo with stock settings with no problems if I don't want to OC my system at first? Or is it a matter of luck, depending on the rest of the system?
The Epox has received top reviews at Anandtech and sems like an excellent, stable board with very good OC potential. It is also cheaper, so right now it is my top choice. The only thing holding me back from getting the Epox is this review at Anandtech. The review says that the board's layout is somewhat awkward. It complains, for example, about the placement of the ATX 24-pin and 12V 4-pin power connectors between the CPU and the rear panel (so that the 24 pin cable will have to go around or over the CPU or memory, possibly blocking air flow) and the position of the IDE connectors just behind the PCIe slot, so that the IDE cables may prevent a long card from seating properly. In comparison, the layout of the DFI seems great. Is this really a big deal for a newbie trying to put together a system? I have never built a system before, so I'm not sure if these layout issues are a big deal, or just a minor nuisance.
So, assuming the answer to both questions is 'yes' (yes, the DFI may require lots of tweaking to get it going, and yes, the layout issues of the Epox might be a big problem), which of these would be the "lesser of two evils" for a newbie?
Thanks in advance for any help, and thanks for all the excellent info you guys provide here!