• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

nVidia Kepler GTX700 (600?) series info here ->

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.
HOLOY OF THE MOLEEE!.

I was reading those Korean leaks... Still not 40% faster compared to 550Ti!. :rofl:

Ok, We will wait for proper reviews. Dont worry. :p
 
I dunno, I can't read Korean....can you?

This graph on that link shows it 42% stronger than a 550 Ti-

GTX-650-Ti-Overall-Ratin1.gif


But this one shows it 30%-

GTX-650-Ti-Overall-Results1.gif



If I had to guess I would say the second one is when higher anti aliasing and anisotropic filtering settings were used, since the GTX 550 has 192 bit bus it would definitely help out in that area.

But again with that said, I don't trust leaked reviews.
 
If that is true, looks like I am the 'most' right. I said it will beat the 550ti easy and trade blows with the 560ti.

But I don't really care, not an upgrade from my 680 :p
 
Review.


... and its removed. lol

HrbOV.jpg.png

Edit: The word 'Ti', as you cant see, is translated in to 'You', as you can see, in English from Italian. :p
 
Last edited:
^Doesn't really show it against any older hardware like GTX500 series.

However, we do know that the regular GTX650 trades blows with the gtx 550 Ti. And this chart is from Tom's hardware-

average20perf1.png




Low details it's 46.8% better and high details 35.6% better. The average of that is 41.2% stronger than a GTX 650.
 
Last edited:
Apes silenced!, I know.

I'm in process of reading a lot of reviews. So wait for my proper judgment. Though its clear and final that its an e-poop. Poopy low end cards by Nvidia this time around.

BTW, I regard reviews of OC'd models as fail. Only reviews for stock models are acceptable during launch and as first review of the new model.

The picture in my last post had the same card that is reviewed by Guru3D. So it was genuine.
 
The sad unforunate truth about nividia cards is they don't usually show their true power until the next generation of software usually shows up. Since they tend to be loaded with features targeted at the future more the present most of the time. There are a few benchmarks and games out there that put the 600 series stuff through its paces a little more. But most of the time its completely wasted on these cards. Its already known that alot of the older dx9 stuff runs worse on the 600 series cards which is hardly a surprise.

So where the the higher end of the 600 series pulls even or past, the lower end of the series will obviously fall short or be unacceptable for the current baselines.
 
Disappointing performance IMO, they really killed it by choking it down to 128 bit bus.

Only 31% over a 550 Ti, so I was wrong with my 40% figure. BUT, it still does blow the 550 Ti away, even by amnesiac's definition....though he would never admit he was wrong too.

I consider 'BLOW' to be at least 10fps ahead in 50 to 60% of benchmarks, that too, of games only. Not 3Dmark etc etc synthetic crap. ;)
 
Back