nVidia Kepler GTX700 (600?) series info here ->

[Amnesiac]

Disappointing performance IMO, they really killed it by choking it down to 128 bit bus.

Only 31% over a 550 Ti, so I was wrong with my 40% figure. BUT, it still does blow the 550 Ti away, even by amnesiac's definition....though he would never admit he was wrong too.

Yes you were wrong in your blow thing.

... and please, dont jump to conclusions. Ok?. That is a sign of immaturity.

ATM, I can see its averaging 10FPS more compared to 550Ti in most games.

Its clear that 550Ti, 650 and 650Ti are targeted for 1080p users, so benching them at 1080p is the proper way. Its really close between 550Ti and 650Ti in games like BF3 and M.E.T.R.O.

To be frank, I know that it was going to happen, because yesterday, I read the TMU number, which is DOUBLE that of 550Ti. So, I knew 10 FPS would be coming my way.

AND to all those who were saying 'trading blows with 560Ti (the beast!)', SUCK IT!.

It cant even come close to 560, let alone 560Ti. Apes silenced!.

What a disgrace comparing a beast like 560Ti with the e-poop like 650Ti.

 

[RollingThunder]

Amnesiac,

I think everyone has had enough of your insulting text and arrogance, after your last post I know I have.

Thread can continue without any further input from you.

RT

 

[87dtna]

I probably shouldn't post because it's only going to get amnesiac in trouble because I know he will not be able to resist responding, but I absolutely must set the record straight.

Yes you were wrong in your blow thing.

I even quoted you showing that you said if it's 10fps or higher then it blows the 550 Ti away....which it is. I admitted I was wrong that it wasn't 40% stronger, but you cannot admit you were wrong too because the gtx 650 Ti is EASILY 10 fps higher in every game let alone 50-60% of them.

It cant even come close to 560, let alone 560Ti. Apes silenced!.

It's within 5% of the 560, what are you talking about it can't even come close?

Its clear that 550Ti, 650 and 650Ti are targeted for 1080p users, so benching them at 1080p is the proper way. Its really close between 550Ti and 650Ti in games like BF3 and M.E.T.R.O.

I doubt that, none of those cards can handle graphically intense games with high/extreme settings at 1080p.

Games like BF3 and metro the 550 and 650 are getting like 20 and 26 FPS at 1080p with ultra settings. So it's not 10 FPS, but it is 30% stronger. This is what I was trying to explain to you before that you can't have a card comparison with FPS it has to be a percentage difference.

SUCK IT!.
Apes silenced!.

That is a sign of immaturity.

 

[TsunamiJuan]

Moving On, anyone have any leaked insight into the updated gk110 info and release data.

 

[freeagent]

I wouldnt consider 10fps to be blowing anything out of the water lol.

Unless you were getting 10 frames on one card, and 20 on the other, but then either way, both cards would still suck, and would look at something possibly stronger

 

[ivanlabrie]

For me, the 650ti is a strong offering for someone on the cheap, being cheaper than a 7850. But still, a 7850 is a much stronger card, let alone a 7950 for bang/buck ratios...

 

[87dtna]

Yeah 7850 is far better bang for the buck, only being $20 more. If the 650 Ti would have been 192 bit it would compete a whole lot better.