OC & Original speed bench?

[Designer]

To the professionals of the overclocking world:

we need a comparing between:
Original intel 3.4GHz
VS
Intel overclocked running @3.4GHz

using the same specifications of cpu and system > cache, FSB, mobo, ram.. etc

and putting the bench results here

 

[Yuriman]

There is one problem with this. Intel's are multiplier locked, so you can only overclock with fsb. For a 2.8c to overclock to a 3.2c, it would have to hit 228fsb, so it would actualy be slightly faster at the same speeds.

 

[Designer]

No no no..

I mean to do like this example:
Intel P4 2.8 800FSB 1MB oc @3.2
Intel P4 3.2 800FSB 1MB original config
Then run the bench

If the results going to be the same or equal thats means:

It's better to buy the cheeper cpu then overclock it to make it runing at that speed you planning to reach to.

Am I right?

.

 

[jonspd]

NO No nO

You will have to up the fsb in order to OC a 2.8 due to the fact they are factor locked. So the one with the higher fsb is going to get a better score.


PLZ dont use such WORD'S

 

[Designer]

I know that fsb will encrease after OC
But the speed will be the same, is it?

 

[jonspd]

Speed?

number's yes , performance no.

Stop with the big lettering already gee's we aren't all 60+ around here.

 

[Designer]

which better in performance?

 

[Sjaak]

*sigh*


Any 2.8C @ 3.2 will outperform any 3.2 @ stock, that is just a given fact.


heck, my 3.0C @ 3.75 gets outperformed by my 2.8C @ 3.71, because the FSB makes up for alot.

 

[jonspd]

The one with the higher fsb is going to get the better performance.

 

[Designer]

Now I get it.

Opps sorry