• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

P3 or Celeron

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

hoytron

Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2001
Location
Duluth, MN
I can only get my P3 850 to overclock to 980 Mhz, and I guess this is all I can get from a cB0. I was thinking of asking a friend of mine to trade the chip for his 900 Celeron. He doesn't overclock, and a P3 850 would sound better than a Celeron 900. I'm pretty sure that his will do 1200 if overclocked. I don't want to ask him to trade if it won't be worth it. So my question is, which is better, an [email protected] or a [email protected]?
 

funnyperson1

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2001
id say theyere about the same speed in normal apps (games, word, etc.) but if you fold or crunch Seti the Celeron will be faster
 

JaY_III

Senior of BX
Joined
Dec 17, 2000
Aslong as you have high 120 FSB options, PCI divider gets to 4...
You have PC133 RAM, then go for it.
got a 900 that does 133FSB easy... still working to get past 138FSB (keeping all my BIOS setting to max, speedy)

the 133FSB (vs 100 for the 850)will make up for the lost cache.

So i'd say go fot it, but what do i know, i got a talking banana for an aviator
 

Yodums

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2001
Location
Ottawa, Canada
The Celeron would be resonably faster.

It would probably hit 133fsb (1200mhz), with good cooling and components. Regardless of the cache there's a good speed gap, and a good FSB gap.

Yodums
 

stymee

Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2001
Location
Troutman, NC
My Celly 900 cD0 does 133, but I need to get some better cooling for it, temps around 38-40C right now with the stock Intel HS and a Papst 33cfm on top.

And the Celly whoops the pants off my [email protected] when it comes to folding!
 

takiwa

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2001
check the database, and read a few posts on this before you trade...the 900's were hit and miss @ 1200...some did it, more did not. I had a 900 that took an act of congress to get it stable @ 1200, and I have never had a chip that put me through so much stress...on the upside, almost all were good for at least 1.1, @ 124...for whatever that is worth. Just my opinion...
 

menk

Registered
Joined
Aug 7, 2001
Location
italy /forlì
funnyperson1 said:
id say theyere about the same speed in normal apps (games, word, etc.) but if you fold or crunch Seti the Celeron will be faster
seti rulez.......
ehm......
celeron @1200........
it's better .............
you can do some bench!!!......
:)
 

Peter007

Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2002
Location
Irvine, Orange County CA
When I had the Celeron 900, it can do 1200mhz out of the box

and you can probably get it to run at 1333mhz as well if you can get it up to 2.0v

I would definitely make the trade
 

{PMS}fishy

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2001
Vantec something or other. I got it for free with a 60mm 38cfm delta. Temps of 35c load. Lapped of course. Get rid of that stock HSF, use it on the video card or something.
 

CrystalMethod

Senior Band Wagon Jumper
Joined
Jun 9, 2001
Location
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
hoytron said:
it's not about money

Well said. My celly 900 is the best overclocker out of the ones I have. The 800 will do 133 FSB on a rare occasion, but not always. It's a weird chip, somedays it'll go to 1066, and run fine until I try and reboot for some reason, and then it won't even boot. Ahh well, such is life I geuss.
 

tainice

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Location
Carbondale, IL
i'd say money IS an issue, why? why don't you simly sell your chip and get something better in return?

Spring break!! all the top off..:D even my puter?! yeah! good bo be a college student!