P4 3.06 benchmarked.

[looktall]

i got these links from a thread at OCAU.

thread on [H] forums.
3dmark compare
pics of sandra benches, from same thread.

impressive. yes?
i haven't read the whole thread, so i'm unsure of what (if any) other benchmark scores there are.

 

[runsalone]

For a laugh, go post this in the AMD chip forum. They will instantly remind you of how someone told them that their XP1700s match the 3.06 chip.

 

[Civic_Addict]

Not to bad.
Looking good.

The 3DMarks aren't all that impressive though. Not that I expected them to change a whole lot. My Ti4400 hits 12,000+.

 

[FIZZ3]

http://www.x86-secret.com/ has a good review up as well. Note how ut2003 actually gains from HT. =)

 

[Civic_Addict]

http://www.x86-secret.com/ has a good review up as well. Note how ut2003 actually gains from HT. =)

I would note it, but I can't read the language.

 

[FIZZ3]

I would note it, but I can't read the language.

I'm sorry, the article is indeed in French... but pictures/benchmarka are universal! =)

 

[markodude]

lol I still kicked its *** on 3dmark- fsb will help a bit though!

 

[4x]

Hi guys my 1st post.
Thought i'd post a compare score from my P4 2.26B

Mine

 

[Civic_Addict]

Why does everyone leave these off/down?
Texture Format Compressed (instead of 32bit)
Frame Buffer Double (instead of triple)

I mean understand it gives you a higher score, but I like my games to look good to. I usually crank everything up.
I still hit over 9000 on 1280x1024 and all settings maxed.

 

[4x]

Usually 3DMark is benched at Default 3DMark settings
Which is what you see .

This way each bench is identical in settings for everyone .

 

[Civic_Addict]

Usually 3DMark is benched at Default 3DMark settings
Which is what you see .

This way each bench is identical in settings for everyone .

Ahh..
Well then I need to set mine to defaults to see what I get.

 

[wasline]

Review

Here a french review: http://www.x86-secret.com/popups/articleswindow.php?id=57

 

[Wommalong]

For a laugh, go post this in the AMD chip forum. They will instantly remind you of how someone told them that their XP1700s match the 3.06 chip.

 

[markodude]

Although we are not talkin hyperthreaded here, and there are a few variables...check this out the SETI team benchmark league - there are a few XP1700+ up there with the best of the P4's.....

 

[DeviLduck]

Thanks to Warp2Search for a TRANSLATED version of 3.06 GHZ Review article:

http://translate.google.com/transla...&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&prev=/language_tools

 

[runsalone]

I'm so tired of the amd freaks and their outrageous claims. AMD must be using subliminal advertising to turn you guys into zombies. Nothing AMD has will match a 2.66 or above. the 2800+ might come close to the 2.66, but barely.

 

[Clarpet]

Although we are not talkin hyperthreaded here, and there are a few variables...check this out the SETI team benchmark league - there are a few XP1700+ up there with the best of the P4's.....

Right...but the 3.06 I'm sure will probably squash that....though the 1700+ has been a good contender

 

[Darkseid]

Hi guys my 1st post.
Thought i'd post a compare score from my P4 2.26B

Mine

Hey, Welcome to the Forum!!! then, 3ghz uh? nice...

 

[CyberFed]

im with Civic_addict , the 3dmark score is pretty much irrelavent, i mean give me a card that will let me play doom 3 (when it comes out of course) at 1024x768 with max detail and a fps higher than100 and im happy, score could be 30,000 or 300 in 3dmark doesnt much matter to me

 

[markodude]

Im not bias toward either AMD or Intel - see my sig. I would say that majority of Intel peeps dont realise how fast AMD chips are. I have got a 2.43hr run on the SETI benchmark with my 2400+, which is running at 2200mhz 175FSB and DDR350 CAS2. My 2.53ES P4 @ 3.0ghz on a 158FSB and DDR420 CAS2.5 will only do a 2.63hr run (it measures portions of an hour decimally)
Make your own conclusions from that.