PIV and cel-t owners run this legacy benchie.

[ol' man]

Here it is.

 

[ol' man]

Here is what I get.

 

[deez]

here's mine

 

[Malakai]

theres something wrong, that bmark has to be specifically optomised for the p/// core. a slower celeron got higher than my 1.6ghz XP, i got about a 15000. lets see what u get in CPUmark99. i got 150. a 1.48ghz cellieT gets 125
-Malakai

 

[jdmcnudgent]

what is this, i ran it and only scored like 10,000.

 

[ol' man]

here's mine

This benchie is FSB intensive also as my 1.6GHz cel-t could not beat yours but of course I get a smokin when I get up into the 1.8GHz range!

 

[ol' man]

theres something wrong, that bmark has to be specifically optomised for the p/// core. a slower celeron got higher than my 1.6ghz XP, i got about a 15000. lets see what u get in CPUmark99. i got 150. a 1.48ghz cellieT gets 125
-Malakai

It has been around for along time. Check this link.

http://www.aceshardware.com/Spades/read.php?article_id=31

Mandel

Mandel is a program by Paul Hsieh that uses mandelbrot sets to benchmark the floating-point performance of an x86-based PC. It is highly optimized for each processor it runs on, and it is additionally optimized for 3DNow!. If you are interested in using Mandel to benchmark your own system, or would just like to get more information on it, click on the above link to go to Paul's Mandel home page.

Here you better check this one too.

http://www.aceshardware.com/Spades/read.php?article_id=61

 

[Burning Phoenix]

I got 8715
I hope smaller means better!

 

[ol' man]

theres something wrong, that bmark has to be specifically optomised for the p/// core. a slower celeron got higher than my 1.6ghz XP, i got about a 15000. lets see what u get in CPUmark99. i got 150. a 1.48ghz cellieT gets 125
-Malakai

My cel-t clock for clock beat your XP but not by a whole lot. You were even running a 166fsb. I was at 133fsb.

 

[Yodums]

Which is it higher the better or lower the better? I got a score of:

11487...

 

[ol' man]

Which is it higher the better or lower the better? I got a score of:

11487...

Higher is better!

I get around 16000 with my cel-t @ 1600MHz.

 

[deez]

theres something wrong, that bmark has to be specifically optomised for the p/// core. a slower celeron got higher than my 1.6ghz XP, i got about a 15000. lets see what u get in CPUmark99. i got 150. a 1.48ghz cellieT gets 125
-Malakai

I got a 122 in CPUMK99

This benchie is FSB intensive also as my 1.6GHz cel-t could not beat yours but of course I get a smokin when I get up into the 1.8GHz range!

guess so...never ran it before

 

[JaY_III]

13917.53
but i only got a copermine-128 (9x133) 1200

 

[doer]

@1604Mhz... damn I hope the f@h team would optimize their code too. (1.2cele)

 

[tainice]

HERE IS MINE

 

[TASOS]

That's it

 

[hnic2k]

Higher is better!

I get around 16000 with my cel-t @ 1600MHz.

i think lower is better

 

[Malakai]

nada, this benchy is specifically designed for p/// core. i know 4 a fact that an XP's multiple FPU's smack around a celly, somethings wrong here, and p4 at 2,8ghz should do much better than a celly at 1.6
-Malakai

 

[hnic2k]

true

 

[martinus]

I would agree that the FPU is normally the strong point of AMD - the reason why AMD zealots like to quote FPU intensive benchies.

Anyway, my C1000A @ 1400 scored 16692.43.