• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

RADEON LE (flashed as normal radeon) VS GF2 MX 32sdr

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

ExtremeOC

Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2000
who would win??

Just curious, i am either gonan get (for soemoen else)

Prophet II MX ( or some other GF2 mx card)
or
a Radeon LE flashed to a started 32DDR??

could soemone help me with a choice?? i need to know relatively soon.
 

explorer

Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2001
Location
Ohio
I'd go with the radeon, my radeon has done perfectly for me, it would take some convincing to get me to buy a different card.
 

Nagorak

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2000
The Radeon is much better than the MX, there's just no competition between the two. The Radeon is arguably as good as the GF2 GTS.
 

asmodean

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2001
Location
Finland
This isn't any NV propaganda now. ATI has had some driver problems, where as you can get new detonators almost weekly...
Radeon is more powerful, altough.
 

Nagorak

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2000
asmodean(r) (May 15, 2001 05:23 a.m.):
This isn't any NV propaganda now. ATI has had some driver problems, where as you can get new detonators almost weekly...
Radeon is more powerful, altough.

Everyone says this, but I've never had any problems with my Radeon card. I certainly DID have problems with the GF2 MX I had before it! Either way, I consider the fact that the Radeon is MUCH faster to be worth a few possible driver bugs. Also, ATI is now regularly releasing driver updates as well.

Either way, I'd either go with the Radeon LE or maybe get the Kyro II (3D Prophet 4500).
 

AKDUDE

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2001
Radeon LE!! Im kind of excited about the Radeon 2 coming out later on this year. Probably in a years time ill actually be able to afford one.
I also hear a Radeon 3 or a two chip deal will be out in jan or so. Cool eh?
AKDUDE