We should be mindful that attrition plays a heavy hand in these types of team combat, er... competition.
Various teams will have peak production levels far out performing their average over time as team members lose interest, change jobs, move, or encounter any number of computer gremlins.
Recruitment of the people here at the forum remains our greatest weapon. From what I can see by the stats (thank you David, and others, who pointed me in the right direction), we have roughly 2/3 the processors doing about 75-80% the work of the other teams. Thus, we crunch more with less numbers.
Get our numbers up (members and good processors) , and we can out perform anyone. IMHO.
Un fortunatly not David. This is a blurp from Stanford. If ya check the latest update on statsman, everythings down to 0 production. I believe this just happened in the past few days and everyones production for one update was 3-4 times higher.
We'll see in the next few days, i'm keeping track of the top 20 producing teams, i'll see wether or not their falling back. And I'll report as soon as they do.
Un fortunatly not David. This is a blurp from Stanford. If ya check the latest update on statsman, everythings down to 0 production. I believe this just happened in the past few days and everyones production for one update was 3-4 times higher.
We'll see in the next few days, i'm keeping track of the top 20 producing teams, i'll see wether or not their falling back. And I'll report as soon as they do.
I think the problem is stanford is not updating the files the stats pages use to update there db as it looks like the scores on stanfords pages are changing Date of last WU on out team page at stanford is 2002-04-02 17:05:42
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.