DIRT 3 revisited ..AGAIN! FX @ 4.0 Ghz.
This is the FX-8150 @ 4Ghz vs the i5 2500K also @ 4Ghz
Now the FX-8150 is £30 more expensive then the i5 2500K, but £50 cheaper then the i7 2600K.
According to your bench the FX-8150 has 20% higher performance then the i5 2500K at the same 4Ghz clock, and from this it looks like the i7 2600K is not going to be much if any better at all @ 4Ghz
Whats more the FX-8120 which is the same CPU as the FX-8150 (only with a lower stock clock speed) is £5 cheaper then the i5 2500K, the FX-8120 should clock to 4Ghz just as well as its big brother.
I'm accumulating quite the collection of FX vs Intel gaming benches and its looking very good for the FX.
Thank's
This thing is not getting the credit it deserves (yet)
Attachments
Last edited: