- Joined
- Feb 15, 2003
Hi all. I decided to do this since I was sick and tired of seeing max GPH ratings that essentially tell you NOTHING about the pump's real-life flow. I really wanted to find out for myself how these 3 pumps (Iwaki MD-15RLT, Danner Mag 3, and Eheim 1250) compare side-by-side, performance wise.
So I went crazy and did some insane googling on the web to find all the flow curve data I could. And now that I know, I would like to share my findings with you all:
For the graph I made above, I got the data from HERE. The data is supposed to be fairly accurate, as they claim it is taken from the manufacturer.
I imagine a typical high-end WC setup has at least 4+ ft. of head.
At a flow resistance of 3 ft., the iwaki already begins to exceed the eheim in GPH. Realistically, the eheim doesn't achieve much of what it's rated at, as evidenced by this review.
So the real performance race is between the iwaki and the danner. Take a look at the crosspoint between these monsters -- after around 5.5 ft the iwaki starts to take the lead and the danner feels the stress. These two seem about equally capable to me.
So I went crazy and did some insane googling on the web to find all the flow curve data I could. And now that I know, I would like to share my findings with you all:

For the graph I made above, I got the data from HERE. The data is supposed to be fairly accurate, as they claim it is taken from the manufacturer.
I imagine a typical high-end WC setup has at least 4+ ft. of head.
At a flow resistance of 3 ft., the iwaki already begins to exceed the eheim in GPH. Realistically, the eheim doesn't achieve much of what it's rated at, as evidenced by this review.
So the real performance race is between the iwaki and the danner. Take a look at the crosspoint between these monsters -- after around 5.5 ft the iwaki starts to take the lead and the danner feels the stress. These two seem about equally capable to me.
Last edited: