The first statement, that's ridiculous and not even an issue here.
To the second statement, you have been asked time and time again to provide concrete proof and sources to this outlandish claim and you have yet to deliver. Furthermore, your arguments have been struck down over and over again by myself and other people. It has been established that SP2 is in fact a good thing for security and any sort of functionality change in Windows XP is marginal at best. You continue to toy with this idealistic notion that SP2 is a horrible thing and somehow makes your system more insecure, and as I previously stated, you have yet to deliver any evidence of this. It has also been stated that downloading and installing individual hotfixes and using alternative means to install them is both unnecessary and could possibly harm the system. Enterprise Admins would do well not to shy away from things like WSUS, just like it's best for home users to use Windows Update. Any Microsoft support person would tell you that. Also, what if something goes wrong with those "alternative" services, you think Microsoft is going to help you fix the problem? I thought not. Bottom line, SP2 is a good thing, for the Enterprise, for the user, for everyone. Until you provide any concrete proof otherwise, which I seriously doubt you can, that's how it will stand.