Too big to fail?

[DeputyKovacs]

Something about these two graphs suggests @HayesK is too big to fail...

 

[the garynator]

Something about these two graphs suggests @HayesK is too big to fail...

Saw that, it's hilarious lol. When one man's production can be seen so starkly at the team level, you know he's a heavy hitter

 

[don256us]

Yeah. It always amazes me when he gets a challenger to only then show that he has yet more. Not sure that he has an endless amount of production but I also think that we have not seen the limit either.

There's a reason he's our #1.

 

[Flamethrower1972]

He is a F@H powerhouse. I bet he uses a lot of A/C.

 

[DeputyKovacs]

Oh look I have @HayesK in my sights. Oh wait, it’s his second inactive folding handle

 

[WhitehawkEQ]

If you add up all the points Hayes has under 5 user names he just might be #1 in the world

 

[Flamethrower1972]

Hayes just folds with power!!!!

 

[the garynator]

If you add up all the points Hayes has under 5 user names he just might be #1 in the world

Easily

 

[Farwalker2u]

The three HayesK accounts I found had 78,284,263,281 + 55,060,815,144 + 40,004,435,598 = 168,349,514,023.
That 168,349,514,023 total puts it at #5 after Anonymous and NVIDIA_Saturn_V, ICCluster, and GuillaumeSmaha!

 

[WhitehawkEQ]

The 5 user names I know of total 189,020,523,477

 

[Flamethrower1972]

Thats a lot of points.

 

[WhitehawkEQ]

Ummm make that 8 user names