Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
Should i consider the sabertooth? the only thing i dont like is that it only has 3 PCIE slots and i wont be able to run quadfire, but this could be a good thing, since if i buy a rampage iv and only use 3 cards ill feel like something is missing and end up wasting money on it..
Sabertooth is a good choice. It is a robust solution and 3 PCIE slots...
It pains me to recommend that board but it is one of the least expensive with 3 PCIe slots
It pains me to recommend that board but it is one of the least expensive with 3 PCIe slots
Why the pain?
UP4 is a good choice as well. The power phasing there concerns me a hair for high overclocks... X79 is about the ONLY chipset I would cool VRM's on. They get toasty on most of the boards I used. So Miguel would want good airflow over that area for the UP4. The Sabertooth I wouldn't worry as much about (to the point I didn't mention it).
This. THere is a premium you pay for the 5 year warranty and I personally dislike the armor... its gimmicky and people hang their hat on it.. but the power bits are a bit more robust than the UP4, which again, isn't a slouch, but PERHAPS some considerations need to be made for very high overclocks on that board... but adequete case airflow will more than likely be fine on the UP4.You pay a lot for the name Sabertooth.
Oh it isnt... to that I say, why a different board in the first place? Ride this out is my take... grab the rads for 3 cards and CPU, run 2 cards. If you get bored or OCD kicks in, get a 3rd. But monetarily speakign, at 1080p even 144Hz its a waste (to me).I can't see it being significantly better/worse than the P9X79 he's running currently.
This. THere is a premium you pay for the 5 year warranty and I personally dislike the armor... its gimmicky and people hang their hat on it.. but the power bits are a bit more robust than the UP4, which again, isn't a slouch, but PERHAPS some considerations need to be made for very high overclocks on that board... but adequete case airflow will more than likely be fine on the UP4.
As far as the future... you seem to lean on the want side more than need. Which is of course ok. I like to think I am practical for my uses while still getting quality hardware. If I was you with your hardware I would:
Rock 2 290x's and call it a day until they are long in the tooth. Sell in 2 years for next gen cards. Don't think about 3/4 cards at 1080p.
Grab the saberkitty or UP4, get all the raddage you want for 3 cards (4 is really a waste of money unless you rock 3 4K monitors, scaling is terrible.. power consumption... yada.).
Oh it isnt... to that I say, why a different board in the first place? Ride this out is my take... grab the rads for 3 cards and CPU, run 2 cards. If you get bored or OCD kicks in, get a 3rd. But monetarily speakign, at 1080p even 144Hz its a waste (to me).
That said, we will of course support whatever you decide to plan for.
That thread was left with you doing some testing.. to which you concluded the board is the issue but ASUS did not?
Anyway, makes sense if there are issues with the board... but just make sure its the board first... if not, buy new and move on, but not sure I would sell a board with known issues, regardless if ASUS said otherwise...
Though one thing I noticed is CFx and BF4. Are you using the Mantle API? Does the issue follow you when using the DX API? Since it is only on BF4, I would think that it is a Mantle thing as TitanFall does not use Mantle (not sure on that point).
ok i will try the 3rd slot... also have you heard or seen any results on using the NZXT Kraken G10 with a single 140 radiator? will definitely be my cheapest solution to control heat
Be sure, when you try the third slot, that you try 1 & 3 together and 2 & 3 together.
Then you'll know if the issue is board related, or slot related. And which slot gives issues