in another thread dream caster inquired about "the perfomance changes with geometry" apparent from my testing of wbs
the short answer is:
No significant superiority that can be directly attributed to a specific wb configuration.
but I've not tested all wbs by any means, and new designs appear weekly
Danger Den, Dtek, and Silverprop have indicated an inclination to send their latest, so we shall see . .
(and I have a Swiftech, Innovatek, and Cooltech in testing)
Why is there no performance "winner" in terms of geometries ?
easy answer: because wb designers are still learning what works (and what does not),
and of course - the manufacturers are making what the consumers wish to buy.
Most (but not all, eh) mfgrs are terribly handicapped by a lack of accurate test data about their and their competition's products;
but this too is changing and the newer products are a reflection of this effort.
So why will testing not reveal the "best" configuration ?
Lets assume, for the purpose of discussion, that there are 10 design factors affecting - unequally - the ultimate performance of a wb design.
Given that each designer will 'favor' these factors differently, and that the 'as built' manufacturing process will be more, or less, effective in the actual implementation of the design;
then it is easy to understand how impossible is an attempt to reverse engineer a wb to extract the performance contribution of a single specific element.
But this limitation does not mean that testing cannot reveal, and quantify, performance differences.
Nor that such a collection of test results cannot be analysed to see if any 'trends' are apparent.
BUT one must be very judicious about drawing conclusions.
for example:
if a grouping of similar wbs does poorly compared to another, what is indicated ?
it could be that one design configuration is superior to another
or
that one of the designs is not yet (properly) developed
most of the wbs for sale today are quite undeveloped in terms of their design maturity
(did I state that gently enough ?)
be cool
the short answer is:
No significant superiority that can be directly attributed to a specific wb configuration.
but I've not tested all wbs by any means, and new designs appear weekly
Danger Den, Dtek, and Silverprop have indicated an inclination to send their latest, so we shall see . .
(and I have a Swiftech, Innovatek, and Cooltech in testing)
Why is there no performance "winner" in terms of geometries ?
easy answer: because wb designers are still learning what works (and what does not),
and of course - the manufacturers are making what the consumers wish to buy.
Most (but not all, eh) mfgrs are terribly handicapped by a lack of accurate test data about their and their competition's products;
but this too is changing and the newer products are a reflection of this effort.
So why will testing not reveal the "best" configuration ?
Lets assume, for the purpose of discussion, that there are 10 design factors affecting - unequally - the ultimate performance of a wb design.
Given that each designer will 'favor' these factors differently, and that the 'as built' manufacturing process will be more, or less, effective in the actual implementation of the design;
then it is easy to understand how impossible is an attempt to reverse engineer a wb to extract the performance contribution of a single specific element.
But this limitation does not mean that testing cannot reveal, and quantify, performance differences.
Nor that such a collection of test results cannot be analysed to see if any 'trends' are apparent.
BUT one must be very judicious about drawing conclusions.
for example:
if a grouping of similar wbs does poorly compared to another, what is indicated ?
it could be that one design configuration is superior to another
or
that one of the designs is not yet (properly) developed
most of the wbs for sale today are quite undeveloped in terms of their design maturity
(did I state that gently enough ?)
be cool