DayUSeX said:
graphics design go a 2gb of ddr and a dual operton system! otherwise if you are just doing graphics design for fun anything that is about an 1700+ will due fine as long as you have globbs of ram. Only time CPU plays a big deal is when you apply filters, and that takes at most what 5 seconds?! not a big deal really.
With all due respect, dayUSex, I must beg to differ. Athlons make excellent graphics workstations. As a graphics professional working with major multinational corporations and also running a small corporation of my own for the past 15 years, I provide all of my collegues and employees with Athlon systems. We have no problems doing large format Photoshop work while simultaneously running Illustrator, several browser sessions, Dreamweaver MX, flash MX and SQL server. All on the same machine at the same time, with no significant decrease in performance. While I do agree that a minimum of 1 gig of QUALITY ram is imperative, I do not agree that the processor plays no real role. Try exporting a 36" x 36" Illustrator file to photoshop at 300dpi and you'll see my point.
One of the most important elements of a fast graphics system (other than memory) is a fast drive. I experienced significant performance gains by switching my OS and scratch file drives to 15000 rpm scsi and using RAID 5 configurations for storage.
In terms of Video cards, even 2-D performance is greatly improved by a quality card. I am running a Tyan 9600 pro right now and find it adequate to the task in a dual display environment.
As in all things, Kenshiro, try to get the best value you can at present. The 2600+ is at a sweet price spot right now ($83.00) and is definitely up to the task. Corsair XMS PC3200 memory has also dropped lately and is a good value.
In summation, if you wish to prioritize your spending for a graphics workstation, put the components in the following order (highest to lowest):
Monitor
Memory
Drives
Processor
Video Card
Hope this helps