- Joined
- Jun 12, 2001
- Location
- I move to often to say for sure :)
I've read a bunch of posts lately that condemn distros that rely on RPM's. I've dabbled in linux for a few years, but still consider myself a noob, since I've never really committed.
Most of the distros I've used, and the one I currently use (SUSE10, which I love) are RPM reliant, and I've never had trouble installing or updating programs.
So my question is...what's wrong with RPM's, what's the better alternative, and why?
Most of the distros I've used, and the one I currently use (SUSE10, which I love) are RPM reliant, and I've never had trouble installing or updating programs.
So my question is...what's wrong with RPM's, what's the better alternative, and why?