2.4A suck anything 100FSB is a waste.
2.4A running at
[email protected], 3:4 Mem for 154DDR, dont waste your time with at 100FSB CPU, in all honesty, greater CPU frequency does not equal better performance. Put it this way, my IT7 MOBO, Rad8500, corsair 3200, and that CPU ^ only give me 9984 on 3dmark2001, but with a 2.4b 533 and OC to 150FSB @ 2.706 and 3:4 mem ratio for 200DDR performance i get 11958 on 3dmark2001. So how does that work?
Simple math my friends, you see at the higher FSB you can send almost an extra gig persecond to the memory. So instead of 3.2Gbs @100FSB you get 4.3Gbs @133FSB, and even higher at 150FSB why do you think the P4 has a quad pumped bus? To allow max data rate through its channels. This allows your videocard, cpu, and all subcomponents to work at peak efficency.
As for the 1.8A, well its a nice CPU, dont get me wrong, 1.8 @ 2.4 is a great overclock, but how long will it last, how many 1.8A's do you see in the NSDS?
Bottom line is this, if you could get a 133FSB get it, even with lower OC you still will outperform any 100 and your games and apps will runs smoother.
Now for the holly grail, if anyone on this forum can get their 100 or 133 to the mother of FSBs, the 200 FSB, with maybe a peltier and watercooling not some LN2 or a fridge, let me know this is my next project that im working on.
Bon Chance in OCing.
Kam
