I got WinXP running on a PentiumPro 200MHz with only 128MB ram... no problem at all, ok not as fast as the 'sig' but no problems going strong
lol, anything is slow on that thing. How could you tell the difference in speed? There are only so many degrees of extreemly slow
ps, I just played around on XP for the first time today and absolutly hated it. I won't buy it because of the registration bs and now I have more reasons not to buy it...
Wtf is up with them moving everything around so you can't find sh$!. I could see moving stuff if you changed them, but they move things just to move the damn things!
So I go to shut down a program that isn't responding. Ctrl + Alt + Del and task manager (I can't remeber for sure, but I think they screwed with the layout of Task Manager for no good reason too) and there where about 40 things running. Is this normal or was it just because I was on the Home version or worse A DELL!?!?!
If theres really that much junk cluttering up XP I want nothing to do with it...as if I ever did.
Anyway, I like W2k. It has a very similar layout to W98 which I upgraded from and runs my games like a champ (XP better then W2k at gaming, I doubt it). Its stable as heck to boot.
ps if anyone wants to take me up on the XP being better then W2k challange, send me a copy of XP Pro and I will compare 3DMark2001 scores w/ XP and W2k