- Joined
- Nov 16, 2002
- Location
- Neenah, WI
Still trying to figure out if the MSI RTX 4070 Super Gaming X Slims are magic or if there's something else effecting PPD on my system. We've pretty much eliminated PCIE bandwidth as the issue as both his MSI cards do the same ppd even with one in a PCIE 4.0 x4 slot, and mine is currently running in a PCIE 3.0 x8 slot. @KeeperOfTheButch 's 2 MSIs are putting out 13+ Million ppd each consistently whereas the Asus RTX 4070 Super Dual in my system only does about 11.5m max (might have seen 12m on certain wu's with overclock), and regularly gets around 10-11m, and as low as 6-7m on bad wus. Thing is, temps are comparable and while the MSIs have higher core clock speed, I seem to be able to overclock more so can run similar gpu clocks.
We ran a PNY 2 slot 4070 super in the new dell xeon workstation he picked up for dedicated folding and while it wasn't quite as high of ppd, it was quite close (~12.9 vs ~13.5m) and he just switched both msi cards into it to see if they still do the same PPD as they do in his main rig (new ryzen system). I figure this test will put the PCIe 4.0 x4 vs PCIe 3.0 x8 question (possible latency differences or something) to bed if they perform the same as in his main rig.
Only other thing I can think of that would be nerfing my ppd is that I'm still running Windows 10 on my machine and he's running Windows 11 on both of his. Has anyone compared PPD output on newer cards between these two OS's? I really would rather not upgrade to Windows 11 if I don't have to lol.
Saw that the default Win 10 scheduler might be causing performance issues (which would make sense if Win 11 is better), but it's quite an old thread with older cards so might give this a try on my machine.
Any thoughts, suggestions, or ideas anyone?
One other theory I'm currently testing is that maybe I'm running up against TDP and it's pulling clock speed. @KeeperOfTheButch isn't running any memory overclock on his cards. I just ran a TDP average in gpuz on my card with +125 on gpu and 600 on memory vs just 125 on gpu and it appears that TDP average dropped by like 10w. So I'm going to test with just the max gpu overclock I can run stable and see what kind of difference that makes. Still don't think this alone would account for 2-3 million PPD difference though, but might be part of it.
We ran a PNY 2 slot 4070 super in the new dell xeon workstation he picked up for dedicated folding and while it wasn't quite as high of ppd, it was quite close (~12.9 vs ~13.5m) and he just switched both msi cards into it to see if they still do the same PPD as they do in his main rig (new ryzen system). I figure this test will put the PCIe 4.0 x4 vs PCIe 3.0 x8 question (possible latency differences or something) to bed if they perform the same as in his main rig.
Only other thing I can think of that would be nerfing my ppd is that I'm still running Windows 10 on my machine and he's running Windows 11 on both of his. Has anyone compared PPD output on newer cards between these two OS's? I really would rather not upgrade to Windows 11 if I don't have to lol.
Saw that the default Win 10 scheduler might be causing performance issues (which would make sense if Win 11 is better), but it's quite an old thread with older cards so might give this a try on my machine.
Any thoughts, suggestions, or ideas anyone?
Post magically merged:
One other theory I'm currently testing is that maybe I'm running up against TDP and it's pulling clock speed. @KeeperOfTheButch isn't running any memory overclock on his cards. I just ran a TDP average in gpuz on my card with +125 on gpu and 600 on memory vs just 125 on gpu and it appears that TDP average dropped by like 10w. So I'm going to test with just the max gpu overclock I can run stable and see what kind of difference that makes. Still don't think this alone would account for 2-3 million PPD difference though, but might be part of it.
Last edited: