Xp1700+ Temps???

[DECODER22]

whats a avrg temp for a xp1700 mines going around 96F to about 99F is this ok??

 

[CSaddict]

Thats good temps, are you O/Ced?

 

[DECODER22]

ok now im at 38 C 100F thats what bios says i need a good program to monitor this i dont know what temp is too high and whats a good temp??

 

[DECODER22]

no im not o/c im at 133 cpu and 133sdram thats what bios says so im at 133/133 on a xp1700+

 

[mustangman]

Temps aren't bad. Are you air cooeld? What voltage are you running at?

 

[mustangman]

Do a search for motherboard monitor it is a decent program for monitoring your temps and voltages, etc.

 

[AntiHeiss]

Your temps are well within spec. I wouldn't worry too much about those temps. If you are looking for a good monitoring program then head to THIS site and download Motherboard Monitor 5. That is the best overall program I have found.

 

[DECODER22]

voltage on core is 1.744V whats a temp thats to high so i know i have 3 case fans and a huge heatsink with a 80mm delta blastin the cpu

 

[DECODER22]

hey on this monitor program says sensor 1 51 F then the other sensors are at 32F i cant even figure out this program plus it syas im running at 1463mhz

 

[mustangman]

Are you running any programs in the background that are stressing the cpu(seti, prime 95, [email protected], etc?) If you are the cpu is under load and it is showing the actuall temp of the cpu under such conditions. My experience is that mbm varies a small amount on temps from bios. As far as your cpu speed it is probably a little more accurate from what I have read because it is sensing the actual clock ticks where as the bios is simply multiplying the fsb by the multiplier to give the speed.
I can't remeber right off what the speed of the 1700 is. Is it 1.4ghz?

 

[DECODER22]

hey man so 100F is ok im not running **** im running explorer and winamp im not stressing anyhting but the cpu is running hot

 

[Arkaine23]

clocks and temps

1700+ is around 1466... it varies by motherboard because actual FSB's are fractional.

I run my 1600+ on the 11x multiplyer as if it was a 1700+ and at 148 FSB (1633 of your Earth Mhz) and 2.0vcore I get temps at load of 40C. More info in my sig.

 

[res0r9lm]

Are you running any programs in the background that are stressing the cpu(seti, prime 95, [email protected], etc?) If you are the cpu is under load and it is showing the actuall temp of the cpu under such conditions. My experience is that mbm varies a small amount on temps from bios. As far as your cpu speed it is probably a little more accurate from what I have read because it is sensing the actual clock ticks where as the bios is simply multiplying the fsb by the multiplier to give the speed.
I can't remeber right off what the speed of the 1700 is. Is it 1.4ghz?

no the 1600+ is 1400 the 1700+ is 1463. mbm is accurate as wcpuid

 

[DECODER22]

ok so whats a temp on a xp1700 i should be worried about so i guess 100F is ok

 

[res0r9lm]

Re: clocks and temps

1700+ is around 1466... it varies by motherboard because actual FSB's are fractional.

I run my 1600+ on the 11x multiplyer as if it was a 1700+ and at 148 FSB (1633 of your Earth Mhz) and 2.0vcore I get temps at load of 40C. More info in my sig.

wow that is a high vcore must be one of the earier steppings. have you tried a lower vcore? It would give you an even better temp if it was stable at lower

 

[res0r9lm]

ok so whats a temp on a xp1700 i should be worried about so i guess 100F is ok

anything under 45c is ok

 

[DECODER22]

cool im trying to get that monitor program to give me liek cpu temps and **** i cant figure out how to work it lol

 

[mustangman]

No, I don't think you should worry 100f. My system runs fine all the way up to 123f although I don't like seeing it get that hot and it hasn't went that high since I improved my cooling. AMD claims that 90c is the max although this sounds outrageous to me.

 

[Arkaine23]

Re: Re: clocks and temps

wow that is a high vcore must be one of the earier steppings. have you tried a lower vcore? It would give you an even better temp if it was stable at lower

If I try 1.95vcore I have to lower the FSb to 146 or 147 or it won't load windows.

 

[res0r9lm]

Re: Re: Re: clocks and temps

If I try 1.95vcore I have to lower the FSb to 146 or 147 or it won't load windows.

too bad. hey it was worth a shot still can't complain with those temps