• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

Xp1700+ Temps???

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.
OP
DECODER22

DECODER22

Disabled
Joined
Jan 16, 2002
Location
Chicago
ok now im at 38 C 100F thats what bios says i need a good program to monitor this i dont know what temp is too high and whats a good temp??
 
OP
DECODER22

DECODER22

Disabled
Joined
Jan 16, 2002
Location
Chicago
no im not o/c im at 133 cpu and 133sdram thats what bios says so im at 133/133 on a xp1700+
 

AntiHeiss

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2002
Location
Texas
Your temps are well within spec. I wouldn't worry too much about those temps. If you are looking for a good monitoring program then head to THIS site and download Motherboard Monitor 5. That is the best overall program I have found.
 
OP
DECODER22

DECODER22

Disabled
Joined
Jan 16, 2002
Location
Chicago
voltage on core is 1.744V whats a temp thats to high so i know i have 3 case fans and a huge heatsink with a 80mm delta blastin the cpu
 
OP
DECODER22

DECODER22

Disabled
Joined
Jan 16, 2002
Location
Chicago
hey on this monitor program says sensor 1 51 F then the other sensors are at 32F i cant even figure out this program plus it syas im running at 1463mhz
 

mustangman

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2000
Location
Indiana, the land of corn
Are you running any programs in the background that are stressing the cpu(seti, prime 95, [email protected], etc?) If you are the cpu is under load and it is showing the actuall temp of the cpu under such conditions. My experience is that mbm varies a small amount on temps from bios. As far as your cpu speed it is probably a little more accurate from what I have read because it is sensing the actual clock ticks where as the bios is simply multiplying the fsb by the multiplier to give the speed.
I can't remeber right off what the speed of the 1700 is. Is it 1.4ghz?
 
OP
DECODER22

DECODER22

Disabled
Joined
Jan 16, 2002
Location
Chicago
hey man so 100F is ok im not running **** im running explorer and winamp im not stressing anyhting but the cpu is running hot
 

Arkaine23

Captain Random Senior Evil
Joined
Nov 8, 2001
clocks and temps

1700+ is around 1466... it varies by motherboard because actual FSB's are fractional.

I run my 1600+ on the 11x multiplyer as if it was a 1700+ and at 148 FSB (1633 of your Earth Mhz) and 2.0vcore I get temps at load of 40C. More info in my sig.
 

res0r9lm

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2001
Location
florida
mustangman said:
Are you running any programs in the background that are stressing the cpu(seti, prime 95, [email protected], etc?) If you are the cpu is under load and it is showing the actuall temp of the cpu under such conditions. My experience is that mbm varies a small amount on temps from bios. As far as your cpu speed it is probably a little more accurate from what I have read because it is sensing the actual clock ticks where as the bios is simply multiplying the fsb by the multiplier to give the speed.
I can't remeber right off what the speed of the 1700 is. Is it 1.4ghz?
no the 1600+ is 1400 the 1700+ is 1463. mbm is accurate as wcpuid
 

res0r9lm

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2001
Location
florida
Re: clocks and temps

Arkaine23 said:
1700+ is around 1466... it varies by motherboard because actual FSB's are fractional.

I run my 1600+ on the 11x multiplyer as if it was a 1700+ and at 148 FSB (1633 of your Earth Mhz) and 2.0vcore I get temps at load of 40C. More info in my sig.
wow that is a high vcore must be one of the earier steppings. have you tried a lower vcore? It would give you an even better temp if it was stable at lower
 
OP
DECODER22

DECODER22

Disabled
Joined
Jan 16, 2002
Location
Chicago
cool im trying to get that monitor program to give me liek cpu temps and **** i cant figure out how to work it lol
 

mustangman

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2000
Location
Indiana, the land of corn
No, I don't think you should worry 100f. My system runs fine all the way up to 123f although I don't like seeing it get that hot and it hasn't went that high since I improved my cooling. AMD claims that 90c is the max although this sounds outrageous to me.
 

Arkaine23

Captain Random Senior Evil
Joined
Nov 8, 2001
Re: Re: clocks and temps

res0r9lm said:

wow that is a high vcore must be one of the earier steppings. have you tried a lower vcore? It would give you an even better temp if it was stable at lower

If I try 1.95vcore I have to lower the FSb to 146 or 147 or it won't load windows.
 

res0r9lm

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2001
Location
florida
Re: Re: Re: clocks and temps

Arkaine23 said:


If I try 1.95vcore I have to lower the FSb to 146 or 147 or it won't load windows.
too bad. hey it was worth a shot still can't complain with those temps