Kingston HyperX Fury DDR3-1866 2X4GB Memory Kit Review

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

Kingston sent along one of their newly released HyperX Fury memory kits for us to have a look at. This particular kit is the white version of the DDR3-1866 MHz 2X4 GB kit they will be offering in a variety of heatspreader colors. The HyperX Fury line will replace the entry level HyperX Blu memory products and is geared towards the beginner enthusiast and gamer. The Fury line of memory will position itself between the HyperX Genesis and high-end HyperX Predator. Kingston aims to give an attractive and affordable option to those users who find themselves wanting a little more than an entry level product, but don’t require a top-of-the-line memory offering. Sounds like a great idea to me, so let’s have a look!

Specifications/Features/Product Tour

Our sample arrived earlier than any product information became available on Kingston’s website, but here is what we received via e-mail as far as specifications and features.

  • PNP: Plug and Play automatically overclocks the memory up to the system maximum specs.
  • Capacities: 1333 MHz, 1600 MHz, 1866 MHz
  • CAS Latency: 9,10.
  • Voltage: 1.5 V
  • Heatspreader: Stylish and aggressive in white/black/blue/red.
  • PCB Color: Black
  • Reliable: 100% tested.
  • Guaranteed: Lifetime warranty.

Once the memory is plugged in, this is what you’ll see for the SPD information. One feature of this memory is its ability to boot up at its rated speeds and timings from the get go. Have you ever plugged in a set of DDR3 1866 MHz memory only to find the motherboard defaults it at 1333 MHz? That won’t be the case with these modules. They’ll boot right up at their rated speed and timings, thanks to Kingston’s PNP feature. To avoid any potential conflicts with the PNP feature, make sure you clear CMOS before installing the memory. As a side note, even though the command rate isn’t shown in the image below, it defaults at 1T.

SPD Table
SPD Table

Once at the desktop, Mem TweakIt gives us a confirmation of what we see above and a few more details.

Mem TweakIt
Mem TweakIt

Today’s review sample is part# HX318C10FWK2/8, which as we mentioned before is a DDR3-1866 MHz 2X4 GB kit. There’s nothing fancy about the packaging, but it does give the potential buyer a good look at the product inside. The cardboard ribbon gives you some basic information on the kit, such as capacity, speed, and the CL rating.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

With the modules removed from the packaging, we can get a closer look. They are certainly attractive and will go great with a white themed build. With the rainbow of colors these kits are available in, you shouldn’t have a problem selecting a color that matches your system’s color scheme.

kingston_hyperx_fury (9)
Kingston HyperX Fury

HyperX Fury
Kingston HyperX Fury

Kingston HyperX Fury
Kingston HyperX Fury

Kingston HyperX Fury
Kingston HyperX Fury

Kingston HyperX Fury
Kingston HyperX Fury

Kingston HyperX Fury
Kingston HyperX Fury

Kingston HyperX Fury
Kingston HyperX Fury

Kingston HyperX Fury
Kingston HyperX Fury

Testing for Stability at Rated Speed

The first thing we need to do is check for stability at the kit’s rated speed/timings. For that task, we call upon our UltraX R.S.T. Pro USB RAM tester, which was kindly provided by UltraX. The R.S.T. Pro is by far the most demanding way to test memory there is, so much so that many memory manufacturers use it to keep an eye on quality control. Depending on the kit being tested, it can take many hours to complete the five pass test we like to perform. In the case of this kit, it took just over four hours to complete. After beating on the HyperX Fury for over four hours, the R.S.T. Pro came up clean with no errors recorded.

R.S.T. Pro Stable
R.S.T. Pro Stable

It’s not quite as intense as the R.S.T. Pro; but for in-OS testing, we chose HyperPi using all eight CPU threads. If you don’t have a R.S.T. Pro memory tester, this is the next best thing. For the vast majority of people, it’s the only utility you need for checking memory stability. No problems encountered here as the HyperX Fury kit flew right through the benchmark.

HyperPi 32M Stable
HyperPi 32M Stable


First, a list of components in the test bed.

Test System
Motherboard ASUS Maximus VI Formula
CPU Intel i7 4770K Haswell @ 4.0 GHz
Memory Various, See Comparison Kits Below
SSD Samsung 840 EVO 500 GB SSD
Power Supply Corsair HX1050 Professional Series
Video Card EVGA GTX 780 Ti Classified
Cooling Swiftech Apogee HD CPU Water Block – 3X120 mm Radiator – MCP35X Pump
Operating System Windows 7 Professional x64

I have several different memory kits to use as comparisons. We have everything ranging from an 1866 MHz kit, all the way up to a 2666 MHz kit to look at. Obviously, direct comparisons are not the intent here, but rather we want to give you an idea of how (or if) the speed variations relate to performance increases. The closest direct comparison we have is the G.Skill 1866 MHz kit, but it has lower timings and will undoubtedly score better on most tests. Of course, the cost plays a part in this as well, but we’ll explore that later.

Comparison Kits
Brand Part No. Series Speed Capacity Timings Voltage
Kingston HX318C10FWK2/8 HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 MHz 2×4 GB 10-11-10-30-1T 1.5 V
VisionTek 900494 Red Label DDR3 2133 MHz 2×4 GB 11-11-11-24-2T 1.65 V
G.SKill F3-2666C11D-8GTXD TridentX DDR3 2666 MHz 2×4 GB 11-13-13-35-2T 1.65 V
G.Skill F3-2400C10D-16GTX TridentX DDR3 2400 MHz 2×8 GB 10-12-12-31-2T 1.5 V
G.Skill F3-14900CL9Q-8GBZL RipjawsZ DDR3 1866 MHz 2×4 GB 9-10-9-28-1T 1.65 V

The graphs below are based off of percentages with the Kingston HyperX Fury kit being the basis, and therefore, always being 100%. The raw data used to make each graph is in the table below each chart.

The first set of tests are from AIDA64 Engineer Edition and include the memory read/write/copy/latency benchmarks. The higher percentage is better, except for the latency test where lower is better. No big surprises here with the Kingston Fury kit holding very tight to the G.Skill 1866 MHz kit and its tighter timings. Neither 1866 MHz kit comes close to the faster kits, but that’s completely expected.

AIDA64 Memory Benchmark Results
AIDA64 Memory Benchmarks – Raw Data
Kit Read Write Copy Latency
Kingston HyperX Fury DDR3-1866 27188 27778 25345 49.6
G.Skill RipjawsZ DDR3-1866 28521 29396 28066 46.4
VisionTek Red Label DDR3-2133 32304 33460 31734 45.5
G.Skill TridentX DDR3-2400 35656 37662 34816 43.6
G.Skill TridentX DDR3-2666 32966 41505 35597 40.8

and wPrime benchmarks showed the same pecking order as above, with the exception being wPrime 1024M. The Kingston HyperX Fury actually beat every kit in the field in the wPrime 1024M test, but all the kits were within a fraction of a second of each other. wPrime seems to respond better to kits with tighter timings, regardless of their speed. The Kingston HyperX Fury kit also managed to top the G.Skill 1866 MHz kit in the SuperPi 1M run.

SuperPi & wPrime Results
SuperPi & wPrime Results
SuperPi & wPrime Benchmarks – Raw Data
Kit SuperPi 1M
SuperPi 32M wPrime 32M
wPrime 1024M
Kingston HyperX Fury DDR3-1866 8.985 482.836 5.867 180.791
G.Skill RipjawsZ DDR3-1866 9.048 473.757 5.837 180.976
VisionTek Red Label DDR3-2133 8.954 469.280 5.836 181.132
G.Skill TridentX DDR3-2400 8.954 466.924 5.851 181.150
G.Skill TridentX DDR3-2666 8.923 462.790 5.881 182.257

Moving on to some real world testing, we land at the x264 and PoV Ray benchmarks. These video compression results show very little difference between all the kits in the sample group, but the x264 pass 1 results do separate the comparison samples a bit more than the other tests. As you can see, the Kingston HyperX Fury hangs tough throughout these tests.

x264 and PoV Ray Results
x264 and PoV Ray Results
x264 & PoV Ray 3.7 Benchmarks – Raw Data
Kit PoV Ray 3.73 x264 Pass 1 x264 Pass 2
Kingston HyperX Fury DDR3-1866 1664.77 185.61 49.86
G.Skill RipjawsZ DDR3-1866 1664.92 190.99 50.05
VisionTek Red Label DDR3-2133 1665.26 192.16 50.05
G.Skill TridentX DDR3-2400 1666.90 193.79 50.07
G.Skill TridentX DDR3-2666 1667.24 196.67 50.26

The Cinebench rendering and 7zip compression benchmarks tell the same story with little difference between all the kits. Less than a 2% difference was noted throughout these tests, and the Kingston HyperX Fury kit actually beat out a couple of the competing kits in the 7zip test run.

Cinebench and 7zip Results
7zip & Cinebench Benchmarks – Raw Data
Kit CB R10
CB R11.5
Kingston HyperX Fury DDR3-1866 31028 8.80 24791
G.Skill RipjawsZ DDR3-1866 31327 8.85 24538
VisionTek Red Label DDR3-2133 31235 8.87 24818
G.Skill TridentX DDR3-2400 31375 8.85 24346
G.Skill TridentX DDR3-2666 31582 8.90 24951

When you consider some of the kits in the comparison samples will cost twice what the Kingston HyperX Fury kit costs, it’s really hard to complain about the results above. All in all, a very nice showing for the Kingston HyperX Fury here.


By doing nothing more than raising the voltage to 1.65 V, the Kingston HyperX Fury kit ran happily at 2200 MHz, it doesn’t get much easier than that! It easily passed a run of HyperPi 32M at this setting… perhaps we have a DDR3-2200 MHz kit in disguise? Could be.

HyperPi Stable @ 2200 MHz
HyperPi Stable @ 2200 MHz

I managed to get up to 2400 MHz HyperPi stable by relaxing the timings a little bit. Voltage was still at 1.65 V, and the timings were set to 11-12-12-35-1T. That’s a 534 MHz overclock… you won’t find me complaining about that.

HyperPi Stable @ 2400 MHz
HyperPi Stable @ 2400 MHz

Returning the kit back to its stock 1866 MHz speed and leaving the voltage at 1.65 V, I wanted to see how much the timings could be tightened up. I managed a pretty good result here and was able to get to 9-9-9-24-1T. The kit was having no part of CL8, but dropping from 10-11-10-30 to 9-9-9-24 isn’t anything to gripe about. The voltage sweet spot for this particular Kingston HyperX Fury kit proved to be 1.65 V, which allowed a substantial speed increase and the ability to tighten up the timings a fair amount. Color me impressed with the overclocking ability this kit demonstrated.

HyperPi Stable @ 1866 MHz 9-9-9-24-1T
HyperPi Stable @ 1866 MHz 9-9-9-24-1T


The Kingston HyperX Fury products should be available for purchase on April 7th according to the information provided by Kingston. The MSRP on this particular kit is $89.99, which lands it right in the middle of similar 1.5 V 1866 MHz kits. So, I think it’s perfectly positioned price wise. However, we usually find the street price often comes in a tad lower than MSRP. We’ll have to wait and see what shakes out on that front.

Kingston’s PNP feature is something I haven’t run across before and takes the guess work out of initial setup. For those less tech savvy folks out there, knowing the memory will be set to the correct speed and timings the first time you boot them up is an attractive option. If stock speeds aren’t good enough for you, this kit is ready and willing to overclock with very little effort. Getting the kit stable at 2200 MHz only took raising the voltage to 1.65 V, no other modifications were necessary. Past that, you will have to experiment with timings, but getting the kit stable at 2400 MHz is definitely doable. The overclocking prowess alone will separate the Kingston HyperX Fury from many other similar kits on the market.

The Kingston HyperX Fury kits will be available in frequencies of 1333 MHz, 1600 MHz, and 1866 MHz. You also have a choice between white, black, red, and blue heatspreaders. For added aesthetic value, all kits feature a black PCB. With the variety of available speeds and colors, you shouldn’t have a problem gearing a set of HyperX Fury memory to your particular needs.

Kingston definitely checked all the boxes with their HyperX Fury memory. Whether you’re a novice PC enthusiast or a more demanding user, you’ll appreciate the good looks and great overclocking these kits provide. I have no problem recommending the Kingston HyperX Fury 1866 MHz memory kit to anyone looking for a high performance memory option.

Overclockers_clear_approved Click the stamp for an explanation of what this means.

Dino DeCesari (Lvcoyote)



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


  1. I probably would have if it wasn't a 1.5 V kit to start....HA! Truth be told I did try a little more voltage, but it got pretty unstable past 2400 MHz, but still..... 2400 MHz from a 1866 MHz kit it pretty damn nice.
    heh well thats nice to know you might want to add it did 2400 next time ..
    some of us like to push that limit .. (example me using blackmombas @ 2666 -11-13-11-31-2T
    hehe yes i read it last night or so
    my bad i just remember thinking.. this could have been pushed harder
    I should add tho god those white sticks look bad A
    Two different benchmarks. Mine is HyperPI, yours is SuperPI. There is a big difference between those two benchmarks. You would think a website called benchmarkhardware would know that.....LOL. If you go and read the review, my SuperPi result was also 8 min and 3 seconds.... and that was at 1866 MHz :)
    didnt see it was hyperpi sorry! but what do u think about performance at 2133mhz 11 12 11 1.5v? for the price its a really good ram isnt it?
    i read your review its nice! 2400mhz isnt stable at superpi 1m! thats not my webside, i just saw and compare xDD!
    How would the Fury 1866 compare to Beast 2400 on a Z77 platform (GA-Z77X-UD3H and i5-3570K)?
    HyperX Fury Black Series 2x4GB DDR3 1866 @1.5V p/n HX318C10FBK2/8
    (it's the black version of the reviewed kit)
    • DDR3-1333 CL8-9-8 @1.5V
    • DDR3-1600 CL9-10-9 @1.5V
    • DDR3-1866 CL10-11-10 @1.5V
    OC: 2400 MHz 11-12-12-35-1T @ 1.65 V
    Kingston HyperX Beast 2x4GB DDR3 2400 @1.65V p/n KHX24C11T3K2/8X
    • JEDEC: DDR3-1333 CL9-9-9 @1.5V
    • JEDEC#4: DDR3-1522 CL10-10-10-27-37 @1.5V
    • JEDEC#5: DDR3-1600 CL11-11-11-28-39 @1.5V
    • XMP Profile #2: D3-2133 CL11-12-11 @1.6V
    • XMP Profile #1: D3-2400 CL11-13-13 @1.65V
    On newegg, the 1.5V "Fury" 1866MHz is priced $80 -so it's cheaper!- while the 1.65V "Beast" 2400MHz costs $95.
    But i found a store (not in USA) which sells the "Beast" at liquidation (closeout?) price, 13% cheaper than the "Fury". So I bought the "Beast" but still having second-thoughts... Please help me get this out of my head, will ya ? :)
    The "Beast" can run @1600 Mhz with CL11 and 1.5V while the Fury can run 1600 Mhz @ 1.5V with CL9 ! And overclocking to 2400 works with lower lantency on Fury than the XMP profile of Beast...
    It seems Fury is actually a little better, right? Then why on earth newegg is offering the Fury cheaper???
    Edit: currently (April 23rd 2014) on amazon, Fury 1866 is priced $89.35 (from 128.50) while Beast 2400 is $88.74.
    Edit2: I know that higher DDR frequency "beats" lower latency, so I suppose 2400 MHz CL11 is faster (at least in syntetic tests?) than 1866 MHz CL10 but this is an unfair comparison, because the former runs @1.65V while the latter @1.5V.
    If we run both @1.65V, both reach 2400MHz, but Fury has a slightly lower lattency according to the review (but on the other hand is unstable? then if we raise the latency from 11-12-12 to 11-13-13 we reach Beast's profile....)
    On 1600MHz @1.5V Fury is a clear winner (CL9 vs CL11), also on 1866 MHz (I'm not even sure Beast can run 1866 @1.5V) but on 2400 MHz they are almost on par, right?
    SO if I'm going to run the RAM @2400 MHz and both kits reach this freq. @the same voltage and "almost" the same latency... but the Beast was 13% cheaper and looks cooler.... so HECK... have I done a good buy?
    Both series are on about the same IC so Hynix MFR or maybe mixed with new CFR. I would check how tight can you set Beast or how low can you set voltage for desired clock.
    I made Beast 2x8GB 2400 C11 review some time ago and tested kit could run at 2400 10-12-12 1.65V.
    I still had no time to test 1866 Fury kit that I got couple of days ago ...
    Thank you very much Woomack, if the kits are rather similar and I bought the 13% cheaper one I should be content with my aquisition :)
    The only caveat is that they are similar in performance and stable settings apparently only @1.65V. At 1.5V Fury is a clear leader (e.g. @1600 MHz).
    So if the user is cautious and doesn't want to run @1.65V (as mobo manufactuers, intel and also JEDEC they all strongly recommend 1.5V and there are multiple blogs/boards mentioning 1.65V might damange the CPU.... ) then if running @1.5V FURY has a clear advantage...
    Is this 1.5V recommendation to be taken for granted? I see those articles/blogs/ forum posts strongly recommending it (at least for Z77 and Sandy/Ivy Bridge) while other reviewers run memory @1.65V with not a word of warning... I'm so puzzled. I don't want to ruin my 3570K, not in the next 10 years...
    I guess I should test the BEAST @ 1866 to see if it can run @1.5V ...
    1.65V won't damage anything. 1.5V is base specs given by Intel but higher voltage won't cause issues and I've never had any issues running memory at much higher voltage.
    Both Beast and Fury memory chips are designed to work with 1.5V. It's just required to set higher voltage above some frequency so at 1600-1866 you can still use 1.5V on both series while for 2133+ you may need to raise it ... it just hasn't been tested by Kingston what timings it will need to run stable on the Beast kit using 1.5V.
    Thank you. Just in case -since what I've constantly read is that the memory controller on the CPU is the problem- what could damage it? I guess not the voltage "per se" but the temperature that comes with it...
    So I got a Zalman CNPS10X cpu cooler (was a big pain in the *back* to install) and it definitely lowers temps with over 10°C under full load in OCCT (25°C ambient) - I get max 79°C core#3 with stock cooler, while after installing the Zalman it gets to 65°C iirc, no o.c. though. Installed with some MX2 leftover instead of the original Zalman-suplied thermal compound (call me cheap, didin't want to unseal it lol).
    Thanks again for all the input!
    I was just so worried because a 3570K costs here in my country more than a third of the average monthly wage... so I wouldn't like to damage it earlier than 10 years lol. Don't ask me where, it's somewhere on the uncharted outskirts of Europe...
    There was an info that higher memory voltage may damage memory controller on Intel Sandy Bridge platform ... still I haven't seen even 1 CPU with broken IMC and memory kits designed for SB were also 1.65V.
    I was running memory at 1.75V for longer on IB without any issues and max up to 1.95V for quick tests ( it was my board's max actually as I would try higher, highly not recommended :) ).