Megahalems vs. TRUE Heatsinks: Stock Comparison on Overclocked i7 Platform


Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

Two top performers in air cooling are the  Prolimatech Megahalems and the Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme (TRUE).  This is an “out of the box” comparison, and is strictly to test the thermal performance of these two heat sinks with stock base and mounting with no modifications. The comparison was done in an environment that is as controlled as possible without having laboratory conditions or equipment.

Test Setup

Both heat sinks will be tested on my bench in open air. Ambient temperature was measured in the room where the tests were performed.

If you want a rough breakdown of fan specs at each voltage setting just divide into three equal divisions, keeping in mind that this controller only gives 11.3v rather than a full 12v at max setting:

Voltage [actual] (v)Speed (RPM)Air Flow (CFM)Noise (dBa)Pressure (Pa)
12 [11.3]2400953555
10 [9.42]2000703045
8 [7.54]1500502530

Fan voltages were measured with a multimeter. The rest (RPM, airflow, pressure, noise) can only be estimated, but from what I can tell it’s pretty darn close.

Image_#1
The Bench

Test Methodology

  • Each heat sink was tested from 8 (7.54)v to 12 (11.3)v fan settings in 2V increments.
  • Each heat sink was tested for 10 minutes at each fan speed with Prime95 small FFTs, with resulting core temperatures recorded as measured by Real Temp 3.36
  • For graphical purposes, temperatures have been averaged. I’ll warm things up prior to the 8V test to create the same conditions the rest of the fan setting tests will see.
  • After the single push fan test, each heat sink was fitted with a second fan for push/pull testing.
  • Each cooling setup was tested at the same ambient air temperature of 21C. Temperature was measured before and after each heat sink was tested to confirm a consistent temperature.
  • Each heat sink will be tested on an un-lapped i7-950 @ 4.0GHz with a vcore of 1.264v.

Prolimatech Megahalems

Temp Shot Mega b4
Thermometer Shot: Megahalem
Megahalems TIM Application
Megahalems TIM Application
Megahalems TIM Spread
Megahalems TIM Spread

Temperature Results:

Single Fan: 8v
Single Fan: 10v
Single Fan: 10v
Single Fan: 12v
Single Fan: 12v
Push-Pull: 8v
Push-Pull: 8v
Push-Pull: 10v
Push-Pull: 10v
Push-Pull: 12v
Push-Pull: 12v

Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme (TRUE)

Temp Shot: True
TRUE Thermometer Shot
TIM Application & Spread: TRUE
TRUE TIM Application
TRUE TIM Spread
TRUE TIM Spread

Temperature Results:

Single Fan: 8v
Single Fan: 8v
Single Fan: 10v
Single Fan: 10v
Single Fan: 12v
Single Fan: 12v
Push-Pull: 8v
Push-Pull: 8v
Push-Pull: 10v
Push-Pull: 10v
Push-Pull: 12v
Push-Pull: 12v

Overall Results

Overall Results
Overall Results

Pretty much as I expected really, a close match. Both coolers performed very well. However, there are a few things I’d like to mention:

  • The base on my TRUE is very flat. For a stock TRUE out of the box, this would tend to be the exception rather than the rule. I think that pitting the Megahalems against any other stock TRUE would likely yield different results.
  • The mounting mechanism for the Megahalems, while well designed and easy to install, did not provide as much tension as I’d like. From what I observed (see TIM spread pictures) the TRUE did provide more stock mounting tension at max. However, both coolers did get a good even spread and adequate thermal bond.

Further Testing

Well, TIM application method definitely makes a difference with the Megahalems. I wasn’t expecting quite this much though. The TRUE was not tested with the line method, as I know this heat sink does not take well to it at all (typically adds ~5C).

TIM Application: Line Method
TIM Application: Line Method
TIM Spread: Line Method
TIM Spread: Line Method
Overall Results after new TIM application
Overall Results after new TIM application

Some interesting information has come out here I think (and forgive me if this is already common knowledge to some):

  • The TRUE seems to be superior at lower fan speeds. I find this odd since the original TRUE has a denser fin pattern than the Megahalems.
  • The Megahalems shows a much larger temperature spread between fan speeds (in particular between 8v and 10v). Whereas the TRUE seems to best it at low fan speeds, the Megahalems quickly steps things up, and even passes the TRUE as fan speed increases to ~2000RPM.
  • With a single fan configuration, the TRUE and Mega seem to perform the same at the max fan speed setting of ~2400RPM. In push pull, the Mega seems to outperform the TRUE after ~2000RPM.
  • Please keep in mind, that even though the Megahalems is leading the TRUE in this test, we’re talking about less than a degree throughout the fan speed range. The larger differences are actually seen while comparing the same heat sink in single fan vs. push pull configurations.

Baditude_df

Loading new replies...

splat

ASCII Moderator

3,956 messages 0 likes

thanks for the great article, baditude

Reply Like

mdcomp

Classic Administrator

5,190 messages 17 likes

Sweet article...unfortunately comment threads are a little messed up at the moment. We are working on it!

Matt

Editor's Note: Comment thread fixed!

Reply Like

MIAHALLEN

Senior Member

5,842 messages 0 likes

Nice testing Pat! Thanks :beer:

Reply Like

I.M.O.G.

Glorious Leader

25,037 messages 3 likes

Nice work baditude!

I see the Megahalem performed much better with the line application method. How did you apply TIM in the initial test? Sorry if I missed it, but I didn't see this mentioned.

Reply Like

baditude_df

Northern Senior

3,714 messages 4 likes

Nice work baditude!

I see the Megahalem performed much better with the line application method. How did you apply TIM in the initial test? Sorry if I missed it, but I didn't see this mentioned.

In a dot, same as the TRUE. It's the second picture under the Megahalems heading.
http://www.overclockers.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/TIM-App-Mega-1024x768.jpg

Thx for your comments guys, it was my pleasure.

Reply Like

dejo

Senior Moment Senior Member

4,142 messages 39 likes

I have been thouroughly impressed with my mega, even with the scythe cheepie single fan. with the old evga board could do any bench at 4.7 with the i7 920

Reply Like

o
overvolting

Registered

20 messages 0 likes

so whatever happened to covering the whole surface area on both surfaces with a thin layer of thermal paste?

Reply Like

baditude_df

Northern Senior

3,714 messages 4 likes

If it was ever standard practice to coat both surfaces fully, it was WAY b4 I ever got into computers.
However, I find that spreading the TIM around on the surface of the IHS till I get full coverage, yields about the same results as using the dot or line method.

Reply Like

I.M.O.G.

Glorious Leader

25,037 messages 3 likes

It was baditude, but it's a legacy method. Most thermal paste manufacturers updated their recommended procedures around the time that integrated heatspreaders became commonplace.

By the way, there's a thread in the news team forum which has a screenshot of your article, mentioned at 3dcenter.org. :thup:

Reply Like

wickedout

Member

706 messages 0 likes

This is one great cooler. I'm so glad I finally got it. Awesome review by the way.

When I applied the TIM (MX-2) I did the line method as shown in this article and then I did smooth it out with an old credit card.

I still have yet to run some tests on it.

Reply Like