Music: A Personal View

Some thoughts on the music issue – Nikita Chrystephan

Apple’s iTunes has now been released for Windows, and it brings with it the Apple Music Store. That brings its proprietary music format AAC, which is somewhat similar to Mp3 but adds DRM. As soon as I saw this, I wondered how long it would take for someone to make a program that would convert an AAC file to an Mp3 file and thereby make the whole DRM thing pretty much pointless. Of course, you already can burn to a CD and then rip that CD in Mp3. That may not even be bypassing DRM (which is illegal, as shown by holding the shift key – go HERE for an article on this).

I am a former p2per; I say former, because Kazaa is dying. More and more people are leeching and not sharing because the RIAA is succeeding in their mission to scare people. They scared me, and they’ve scared people I know who used to do p2p quite a lot. I am worried about this, because I tend to like obscure bands like Renaissance, Nick Vigarino, Terranova,and Fairport Convention. You can’t find those in most music stores even real ones.

With the online music stores that have less selection than your average Hastings, you simply can’t get these bands. I happen to live where there isn’t an actual Hastings within 100 miles of me, and it’s very inconvenient to travel that far to buy music. Thus, I am stuck with Amazon.com, which actually has a decent selection, but probably not as large as some people would like (I would like feedback as to whether everyone can find their favorite obscure groups there).

CD’s are not versatile. You get only certain songs, which are chosen by someone other than you. Many people do not want every song on that CD because, in their opinion, they aren’t all worth listening to (I have run into this myself from time to time, but I listen to talented enough groups usually that most of their songs have at least some redeeming qualities, which make them worth listening to at least sometimes).

Online music stores are versatile. You can download any song you want (albeit within their extremely limited selection). I like this, and I will eventually switch to buying music online partially because of this. However, I say this with a few reservations.

My first issue I have already brought up – the very limited selection of music is a serious problem, which will probably go away within a few years.

The second problem is worse: they are asking about the same price you pay for a CD (CDs average around $13, or maybe a little higher and average about that many songs) for a downloadable file that is little better in quality than an Mp3, if at all. This is far worse quality than a CD. The DRM on AAC files is pretty loose and I find I could live with it, if only because you can burn the files onto an audio CD and do away with those DRM controls entirely (I’ll explain why this is important to me later).

Yet, even with the lower quality on AAC, the prices are still the same as if you were buying a much higher quality song. I have quite a good stereo setup, with which I can hear the difference between and Mp3 and a CD quite clearly, and I don’t want pay the same for less.

The third problem with online music is the DRM.

As I recall, AAC lets you copy the file three times from the parent machine and onto an audio CD. However, if you happen to back up your AAC files by directly copying them onto a CD (without converting them to regular audio format), it will use up one of your copies; and if you format your original machine for whatever reason without first de-authorizing, you will have to download the song from Apple again. Then you’ll only have two uses left, having used one up (and you cannot get three uses from a copy of the originally downloaded file). From personal experience, I know that I cant always prepare like that for an unexpected system crash because it is *unexpected* Backing up I can do, de-authorizing is less realistic.

What I Would Like

Cheaper music downloads (remember I am used to getting this music for free, so even agreeing to the principal that I ought to pay for music at all is a major adjustment). I would not mind paying 50 cents a song, but I would really love an all-you-can-eat option, where I pay $30-40 dollars a month and get access to all the songs I want (note I am on a dial-up here). That’s way more than they make off me now and way more than they ever made off me in the past from record sales. Before, they probably made $50 a year, if that.

I expect selection to go up constantly, until it is greater than the offline selection, because they don’t have production costs. It doesn’t cost them very much to have a file sitting around on a hard drive somewhere. Next, there really should be a way to save your lost/reduced-sharing files if you lose them unexpectedly, yet still find a way to minimize/eliminate people trying to extend the use of their or other people’s AAC’s.

I always knew that eventually p2p would die, and I knew that I better get while the getting was good before it was all gone. Ever since Napster was shut down, I had prepared myself. However, I want to say that from personal experience, even though I have far more music now than I ought to for the amount of money I spent over the last few years on music, I think I spent more on music than I otherwise would have because I was exposed to music I hadn’t heard before and then went out and bought the CD, because it sounds better.

I am not a person who has ever spent a lot of money on music, though, so maybe people who did spend a lot on music spent less after using p2p than before, and probably people who either don’t notice or don’t care about sound quality spent less after p2p, but I didn’t.

Now, after I have voiced my opinion on the music scene, you may flame me all you want.

Nikita Chrystephan

Loading new replies...

d
dgk

Member

808 messages 0 likes

A month and no one addressed this. Not a big issue I guess.

1) What do you think of the information presented in the article, do you share the same opinions

Many of the same points, yes. But while I understand not liking to buy a CD because you only want some tracks, there the matter of artistic integrity. Certainly some CDs are just compilations of stuff, but in others the artist spends a great deal of time picking the songs to include and the order that they are in.

The quality is another issue. Getting an MP3 of a song is not the same quality is the original and shouldn't cost anywhere near the original.

2) Is peer to peer dying due to the RIAA tactics or has the file sharing community moved elsewhere ?
Don't know, not being a P2P person.

Reply Like

click to expand...
Avatar of Pinky
Pinky

Member

6,321 messages 22 likes

Yes, p2p is dying, as it probably should. I'm a p2p user and know the difference between theft and use. Most of what I've used on the per to perr networks I've stole, and vice versa. It's a breeding ground for getting what you need without having to pay for it.

Bottom line, if there's ever money to be made in writing software and/or making and recording music or movies, then p2p must die. As an artist who PAYS to have my music available to the public, I can atest to the frsutration in knowing I will likely NEVER make a dime off my work.

Reply Like

Avatar of davidw2005
davidw2005

Disabled

145 messages 0 likes

I don't think their tactics will do a thing...the chances of getting caught still remains very minimal. Only ~200+ people have been caught, compared to the millions of users...!

Second, I don't see how apple will ever make it in this realm. I know they are doing decent, as regular people are buying it. I would be very surprised to see 1 person switch off of kazaa to buy the songs. Imagine...spending $1/song when you get d/l it for free...it'll never fly with the file sharing people. Especially when I know people that have 4000+ songs d/l...of course they wouldn't buy that stuff. I don't necessarily condone any file sharing...but you have to understand it's the most logical path. It's like paying $600 for Office XP Pro...or d/l it in a few hours.

Reply Like

click to expand...
Avatar of zabomb4163
zabomb4163

Member

2,600 messages 0 likes

It's like paying $600 for Office XP Pro...or d/l it in a few hours.

i got my copy for 22$ shipped thank you :p

Reply Like

Avatar of cursor
cursor

Member

984 messages 0 likes

i got my copy for 22$ shipped thank you :p

So your copy of XP Pro was pirated. There's no difference between buying a pirated copy and downloading one.

Well, maybe one. You can delude yourself with the polite fiction that the software you bought was legit.

Reply Like

Avatar of zabomb4163
zabomb4163

Member

2,600 messages 0 likes

ordered it directly from microsoft.com.....so i'm pretty sure its not pirated :p .

i'll a nice picture of the hollogram on the cd if you'd like. its 100% legit.

Reply Like

Avatar of cursor
cursor

Member

984 messages 0 likes

a-ha. Some promo deal. I see said the blind man. ;)

Reply Like

Avatar of druidelder
druidelder

Member

449 messages 0 likes

1) some yes, some no
2) no, but it is harder to find mainstream files from sharers (they are not going after downloaders), but there is a big movement towards trading live recording files from bands with open taping and trading policies (dispatch, phish, guster, oar, etc...). However, many of the people that trade legal tapes of this nature don't like the mp3 format because it is lossy.
3) some yes, some no
4) my opinion of these services (for the most part) is that they are the pirates. I should pay them same $$ for a cd when I get lower quality and a host of other issues. Try reasonable pricing and then we'll talk.

Reply Like

Avatar of PingSpike
PingSpike

Member

633 messages 0 likes

What they need to do....is make CDs reasonably priced. THAT will fix their 'declining CD sales' (which, btw, is a load of crap...maybe they've forgotten that we are just now recoving from a recession. Were they expecting sales to skyrocket?) A CD should cost around $5. That is what they should cost. Not 16.99 or whatever. Right now, I only buy like one CD every year tops. And its a band I really, REALLY like. Why? Because I'm not an idiot and I know that paying 18.00 bucks or whatever for one song thats currently popular and I'll be sick of in a month is a bad investment.

I think the pay online services are a move in the right direction...but they aren't really enticing me with their prices or selection. I only want obscure stuff enough to pay for it, and they don't usually have that for sale.

Reply Like

click to expand...
Avatar of Pinky
Pinky

Member

6,321 messages 22 likes

The Verizon case form earlier in the year was overturned recently. Have fun swapping again (until the RIAA figures out what to do next to seize grannie's pension).

Reply Like