I've read several topics answering similar questions but nothing that quite answers mine.
I want to upgrade to SATA if it's worth the money and will show an improvement. I've currently got 2 Maxtor 7200 IDE drives totalling 280gig. I can burn some stuff to dvd and get that down to 200 easily enough. Should I buy a normal 250gig SATA and move the data from both drives over; or buy a raptor to run the OS and programs plus keep one of the IDE drives as storage/PVR/dvd ripping space?
I cannot afford to buy multiple drives, so just buying 2 raptors is not an option. I also don't want to do this if the improvement will be negligible.
Is it better to speed up all drive access a little, or speed up the OS by a lot and keep low speed storage for things not used very often?
Is normal SATA so much faster than IDE that I will see the difference?
Misellus
I want to upgrade to SATA if it's worth the money and will show an improvement. I've currently got 2 Maxtor 7200 IDE drives totalling 280gig. I can burn some stuff to dvd and get that down to 200 easily enough. Should I buy a normal 250gig SATA and move the data from both drives over; or buy a raptor to run the OS and programs plus keep one of the IDE drives as storage/PVR/dvd ripping space?
I cannot afford to buy multiple drives, so just buying 2 raptors is not an option. I also don't want to do this if the improvement will be negligible.
Is it better to speed up all drive access a little, or speed up the OS by a lot and keep low speed storage for things not used very often?
Is normal SATA so much faster than IDE that I will see the difference?
Misellus