• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

Micro-ATX board....will 760g suffice?

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.
There are some games, FarCry4 comes to mind that won't load if it senses a dual core CPU. Just putting that out there
 
OP is wanting to do this on a budget. The G3258 when significantly overclocked will equal or exceed the many of the AMD APU quad cores. A lot of games do not use more than two cores very well anyway and so the greater per core performance of the G3258 is an advantage, at least when overclocked to the mid 4.x ghz range.

Check this out: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/pentium-g3258-b81-cheap-overclocking,3888.html

There are some games out there that won't even start up unless you have a four core cpu. Oops, Johan beat me to it.
 
If you went per core performance at the same clocks the newer APUs have a better IPC than the FX. Here's what I mean


AMD
bassnut / A10-7850K @ 4707.67MHZ / H20 / 14 min 3.092sec
Johan45/ AMD 1090T @ 4.9/H20/ 14m 09.328
Johan45/ AMD 1090T @ 4853 / H20 / 14m 14.578s
bassnut / A10-7850K / H20 / 14 min 19.764 sec
Dr. McCoy/FX 8320/H2O/14m 23.735sec
Johan45/ AMD 1090T @ 4812 / H20/ 14m 26.719s
Johan45/ AMD 1090T @ 4741/ H20/ 14m 38.375s
bassnut / A10 7850K / H20 / 14m 38.732
PolRoger / FX-8370 / Water / 14m 40.075s
Scotty / FX-9590 / Water / 14m 40.406s
Scotty / FX-9590 / Water / 14m 44.359

This was taken from the december SPi32 challenge that had a 5.0 cap. If you notice the FX was still beaten even with a 300MHz advantage plus bones has some skill when it comes to Spi.Also of note is it beat the 1090T I was running with a 200 MHz advantage. AMD really has made some improvements with their chips. Still not the intel killer but finally has passed the PII.

I think my 860K at 4.4 GHz is every bit as fast as my 6300 at 4.7 GHz. For that matter my 8320 at 4.6 GHz. Granted my workloads aren't anything like RGone's encoding etc.... I like the fact that that I need less cooling, have a more up to date chipset. To each his own I guess. I would stay away from the Intel two core cpu without hyperthreading.
 
If you went per core performance at the same clocks the newer APUs have a better IPC than the FX. Here's what I mean


AMD
bassnut / A10-7850K @ 4707.67MHZ / H20 / 14 min 3.092sec
Johan45/ AMD 1090T @ 4.9/H20/ 14m 09.328
Johan45/ AMD 1090T @ 4853 / H20 / 14m 14.578s
bassnut / A10-7850K / H20 / 14 min 19.764 sec
Dr. McCoy/FX 8320/H2O/14m 23.735sec
Johan45/ AMD 1090T @ 4812 / H20/ 14m 26.719s
Johan45/ AMD 1090T @ 4741/ H20/ 14m 38.375s
bassnut / A10 7850K / H20 / 14m 38.732
PolRoger / FX-8370 / Water / 14m 40.075s
Scotty / FX-9590 / Water / 14m 40.406s
Scotty / FX-9590 / Water / 14m 44.359

This was taken from the december SPi32 challenge that had a 5.0 cap. If you notice the FX was still beaten even with a 300MHz advantage plus bones has some skill when it comes to Spi.Also of note is it beat the 1090T I was running with a 200 MHz advantage. AMD really has made some improvements with their chips. Still not the intel killer but finally has passed the PII.

Makes me wonder if I should have gone FM2+ and the best APU I could buy and overclock it like mad...
 
Intel i3 http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=8526347&CatId=11860 vs FX-8310 http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=9494388&CatId=11857

I believe the FX-8310 runs in mATX boards. Not too bad on the VRM at stock, leave green on.... 760G handle it just fine. I'd look for an Asus 760G chipset board, but that's me.
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=8398367&CatId=7244

Not sure about core vs core here. I've never run an i3 dual core before. But if performance was close enough, I'd imagine 8 cores vs 2 cores would be a lot of fun.

"It can't overclock" Which is true to an extent. Find and know the limits, find and know your cooling capabilities and OC based on that.

If you need examples and help overclocking on 760G AMD chipsets, I'd gladly help. :D

Sorry if this is BUtt In material. Somewhat of my opinion.... FX-8310 > i3-4xxx
 
Intel i3 http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=8526347&CatId=11860 vs FX-8310 http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=9494388&CatId=11857

I believe the FX-8310 runs in mATX boards. Not too bad on the VRM at stock, leave green on.... 760G handle it just fine. I'd look for an Asus 760G chipset board, but that's me.
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=8398367&CatId=7244

Not sure about core vs core here. I've never run an i3 dual core before. But if performance was close enough, I'd imagine 8 cores vs 2 cores would be a lot of fun.

"It can't overclock" Which is true to an extent. Find and know the limits, find and know your cooling capabilities and OC based on that.

If you need examples and help overclocking on 760G AMD chipsets, I'd gladly help. :D

Sorry if this is BUtt In material. Somewhat of my opinion.... FX-8310 > i3-4xxx

Keep in mind that I did find that this exists...
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813157582&Tpk=am3+

Its a 970 chipset mATX board...



If its a setup I'd go with, I'd be looking at the fx-6300 or 6350 really, but i3-4xxx CPUs are beginning to look more attractive.
 
Well, if this is the case, i.e. some games not even loading with a dual core CPU, then I would throw my vote to the AMD 860k for budget gaming.
 
Oops nvm i found it before, thought i had found a different board. Sry
 
Last edited:
Back