• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

Job CPU time vs. job runtime

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

magellan

Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2002
I know job runtime is wall clock time, but what is CPU time measuring? If a job were to use 100% of a single core, single CPU's processing resources for the entire runtime of the job would the CPU time always = runtime?

In multi-CPU, multi-core setups if all the CPU's/cores were utilized at 100% would the job CPU time exceed the job runtime? Would the difference between the runtime CPU time be an even multiple of the number of CPU's/cores in this case?
 
You talking about in a mainframe?

Regardless the answer is similar...it is how much time the cpu is actually used processing the job/task, or even the os. This does not count for idle states or waiting for I/O, etc... active cpu time.

Edit (more details):https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPU_time
 
Last edited:
You talking about in a mainframe?

Regardless the answer is similar...it is how much time the cpu is actually used processing the job/task, or even the os. This does not count for idle states or waiting for I/O, etc... active cpu time.

Edit (more details):https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPU_time

Thanks ED, this pretty much confirms what I thought.

These stats aren't for a mainframe but for two HPC clusters, I had thought I'd have to explain the differences between the aggregate runtime stats and CPU time stats (because both stats are usually almost exactly the same, but always differ by a couple of hours).
 
Back