Make sure to run this at least twice. I found the first run after starting the program can be bugged and can produce scores up to 5000 points lower than subsequent runs.
tweaking ftw - Couldn't get 4c/8t 4.8ghz stable for the heavy multitasking part sadly, but the 1st 2 tests went up by ~7k. Staying with 4.7ghz till i get better cooling.
Kenrou / i7-6700k / Air / 140224
just for the lulz i turned HT off for this bench - 4c/4t
Not sure if I can do more... I was realbench stress test stable at this clock for an hour (and 1.342V), so maybe it has more in it.. temps only hit 71C here...
Earthdog / i7-6950X / Water / 205921 (GTX 980 Ti Xtreme Gaming)
EDIT: Johan, you don't need to put up all my scores.. highest are fine.
I am fighting fair... I have you beat already with the 6700K......... I just haven't posted the score yet . I was not talking about beating you with a 10c/20t CPU which my first post already beat our best score on 6700K, none the less the one I just posted this morning.
Really, having multiple entries for the same CPU is confusing things on the board to me.
Bad run... . Who the hell knows... I noticed my memory was well below yours... otherwise, no clue outside of me running a bloated OS that desperately need to reimage.
I'm not a tweaker, LOL... I am raw horsepower!!!!!!!! This is why I don't participate in PCMark benches or really old school 3D. Too many tweaks, LOL! I can see people complaining about a $1700 processor or running more than water, but 100 MHz? Get your hackles up and come get some K!!
Though for clarity I did not change the 4.8GHz speed to (now handily) beat your current high score.
Not sure what was or was not biggest contributor, just saying going from 3200 MHz to 3600 MHz along with cleaning up processes brought me over the hump. You are within tweaking striking distance though.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.