-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
TualCeleron 1,46 GHz as good as ?
- Thread starter Taisho
- Start date
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2000
- Location
- Peoria Ill
You can compare it to anything ! Moo.
Seriously, it should be running CPU benches about as fast
as an XP1600 or P4 2gig....
Your 3dmark score is about what I get with a GF3Ti200 (210/530)
in either of my systems. A couple hundred higher even....
Seriously, it should be running CPU benches about as fast
as an XP1600 or P4 2gig....
Your 3dmark score is about what I get with a GF3Ti200 (210/530)
in either of my systems. A couple hundred higher even....
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2002
What chip is it again? I forgot. The 1.1a @ 1320 i had before with an 8500 @ 281/324 gets about the same.
The link is here.
http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=5092210
With the 8500 at 250/275(stock), I got 7061 3dmarks.
If the fsb is anything over 120mhz I think you could do a little better.
The link is here.
http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=5092210
With the 8500 at 250/275(stock), I got 7061 3dmarks.
If the fsb is anything over 120mhz I think you could do a little better.
That score is about right. My [email protected] scores 7512 with 8500LE @ 275/275. You have higher GHz but I have higher FSB.
Last edited:
- Thread Starter
- #5
here my Benchmark: http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=5261269 Board is Via Apol. 133 A, 4Bank interleave on, RAM 2-2-2
i know a guy who got an TualCeli 1 @ 1,4 ( FSB 140 ), ATI Radeion LE ( 297 / 297 oc ), ABIT BX Board and got 8200 Points
i know a guy who got an TualCeli 1 @ 1,4 ( FSB 140 ), ATI Radeion LE ( 297 / 297 oc ), ABIT BX Board and got 8200 Points
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2001
yeah that seems on target for that speed, but you can get higher ...my rig has gone up tp 8484 3dmarks....with some cas2 ram i could get 86-8800.....
...my rig has gone up tp 8484 3dmarks....with some cas2 ram i could get 86-8800.....
Seems right and for reference this is mine from a
P4 1.4ghz willy, 384ram and Ti4200
everything stock
8313 3D marks
http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=4362935
P4 1.4ghz willy, 384ram and Ti4200
everything stock
8313 3D marks
http://service.madonion.com/compare?2k1=4362935
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2001
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2002
not even close
I got my modded 1ghz celeron A to work with my mobo but when I run 3Dmark 2k1, I only get 5300 points. Could this be due to the fact that I had to set the "cpu hardwired IOQ" to1 instead of 4 to get the system to boot. Is there a way to fix this performance drop.
I tested a 733mhz p3 with the setting at 1 and it was about 20% slower than when the setting was at 4.
Abit vl6 mobo
Radeon 8500le-64mb@250/250
256mb pc133
celeron [email protected]
I got my modded 1ghz celeron A to work with my mobo but when I run 3Dmark 2k1, I only get 5300 points. Could this be due to the fact that I had to set the "cpu hardwired IOQ" to1 instead of 4 to get the system to boot. Is there a way to fix this performance drop.
I tested a 733mhz p3 with the setting at 1 and it was about 20% slower than when the setting was at 4.
Abit vl6 mobo
Radeon 8500le-64mb@250/250
256mb pc133
celeron [email protected]
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2001
- Location
- Wash. State
Some of your guys scores seem a little exhagerated to me, what tests are you running? I have checked to see what the highest scores are with a Celeron between 1.0 gig to 1.6 gig and the highest score is only around 7200 3dmarks. I have taken the system in my sig and run it as fast and ragged as it can go and gotten the high score of around 6700. That is with cas2 ram, and my vid card close to as fast as it can go. I know that I dont have the best OC'ing video video card though. I will go and check to see what kind of scores that the Radeon 8500's are getting with Tualatin's and get back to this post. Because if they are that much better I will be getting one for myself.
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2001
- Location
- Wash. State
Looks like I may start shopping for a Radeon 8500. They are getting scores of over 8000 3dmarks with a similar system as mine.
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2002
Yea, I was going to say. It seems alot of people with the tualatins also have 8500s. I think its because they both have the most value over any other video card or cpu.
But yea. The tualeron w/ 8500 scores are getting pretty high. When i recieve my BX-133 I expect my tB1 1.2 to reach 140fsb and my score to be close to 8500 or 9000. Thats also with cas2 memory.
BTW, back when i got my 8500 like near june, the best deal was a 250/275 card with 3.3ns memory at newegg. Back then it was around $90. Stock i got the memory to 324 and core to 281. I think thats pretty good. It was labeled as "builtbyati bulk". Read the reviews for the cards and you will see everyone else got the card with 3.3ns memory. See if they still have this card. Its not likely, but maybe.
But yea. The tualeron w/ 8500 scores are getting pretty high. When i recieve my BX-133 I expect my tB1 1.2 to reach 140fsb and my score to be close to 8500 or 9000. Thats also with cas2 memory.
BTW, back when i got my 8500 like near june, the best deal was a 250/275 card with 3.3ns memory at newegg. Back then it was around $90. Stock i got the memory to 324 and core to 281. I think thats pretty good. It was labeled as "builtbyati bulk". Read the reviews for the cards and you will see everyone else got the card with 3.3ns memory. See if they still have this card. Its not likely, but maybe.
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2002
- Location
- San Marcos, Texas
I've got a 1.1 Tually at 142 fsb with a ti4200 at 603/312, and I got 9500 3dmarks! The memory timings are 7,9-2-3-2. When I get a watercooled rig I can hopefully reach 145 or 150 fsb...
Thanks, funnyperson
The memory timings are 7,9-2-3-2. When I get a watercooled rig I can hopefully reach 145 or 150 fsb...Thanks, funnyperson
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2001
mateo, click the edit button, you can delet one of them...
- Thread Starter
- #19
mateo88 said:I've got a 1.1 Tually at 142 fsb with a ti4200 at 603/312, and I got 9500 3dmarks!
Thanks, funnyperson
this is normal, because an GF 4200 is always 20% fasten than an ATI 8500, furthermore your FSB is about 10 MHz higher
it seems to me, that my low scores, are caused by the Via Apollo Pro 133 A Chipset. Because another guy have almost the same system as me, but only an BX-Board have 8200 Points..
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2002
- Location
- San Marcos, Texas
The chipset may very well be the cause. It seems the memory bandwidth isn't as good on those as it is on intel chipsets. A previous motherboard I had befor my Tusl2-c had teh apollo pro 133, and the bandwidth was only like 2/3 of what it is now.
