- Joined
- Feb 2, 2002
- Location
- New York
Nvidia was once the top dog, now it's tripping over it's feet just to compete with ATI. ATI released the Radeon 9700 PRO in september and it was truely a Next generation card. Without question it was king. Last year was the first year that Nvidia didn't launch something the second Q2. The Geforce FX comes out 6 months late and it's in the same generation the Radeon 9700 PRO is. So it took Nvidia 7 more months than ATI to produce a similar class product. You would atleast expect this delayed card to be much faster than the Radeon 9700 Pro, it only makes sense. That you be the only reason why a company would miss a Second Quater Launch is because they have some amazing for us.. Unfortunatly this isn't the case. The Geforce FX is about 5% faster in SOME real world tests. WHAT!!! 6 months for this? Remember the card is running at 500/500, while the Radeon 9700 is running at 325/310... I mean that must say something right there. Lets just say for example that the R350 will be clocked at 400/800.. which is completely reasonable for a R350 (and probably be clocked high than that but anyway). Now the R350 is coming out within weeks of the Geforce FX release... The R350 will without question be a Geforce FX killer, yeah I said killer. I'd say about 15-20% faster than a Geforce FX. Did I mention the noise of the card? The GeforceFX is the loudest stock cooled card in the world.
I find it quite aronic that the first time Nvidia uses 3Dfx technology and adds part of it's name for their product. And now this is the first time Nvidia's product didn't live up to the hype, not to mention the card is clocked higher than Nvidia original hoped just to bring it up to ATI's performance. I think whether or not you are Nvidia fan, we have have to agree that the Geforce FX is a HUGE dissappoint ment esspecially to die hard Nvidia fan who hate ATI. Someone might say drivers, they're not mature yet... I don't think drivers can same the Geforce FX... They had 7 months longer than ATI... so excuses...
ok, someone posted that the GeforceFX will cost $599 and the person wrote "confirmed"... ok everyone this is NOT true so don't believe it.. Nvidia isn't that stupid..
I find it quite aronic that the first time Nvidia uses 3Dfx technology and adds part of it's name for their product. And now this is the first time Nvidia's product didn't live up to the hype, not to mention the card is clocked higher than Nvidia original hoped just to bring it up to ATI's performance. I think whether or not you are Nvidia fan, we have have to agree that the Geforce FX is a HUGE dissappoint ment esspecially to die hard Nvidia fan who hate ATI. Someone might say drivers, they're not mature yet... I don't think drivers can same the Geforce FX... They had 7 months longer than ATI... so excuses...
ok, someone posted that the GeforceFX will cost $599 and the person wrote "confirmed"... ok everyone this is NOT true so don't believe it.. Nvidia isn't that stupid..
Last edited: