-
Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!
AMD Athlon T-bird 1400 (266) @ 1843MHz (320)
- Thread starter AtomicGuY
- Start date
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2001
- Location
- Edmonton, Alberta
You should wait till the Palomino Core comes out, sell your 1.4GHz cpu and then slap on the Palomino and crank that sucker up!
btw, my 3Dmark2001 score is "201" only because I'm using a 4MB RIVA128!!!
LOL, GeForce2, here I come.
btw, my 3Dmark2001 score is "201" only because I'm using a 4MB RIVA128!!!
LOL, GeForce2, here I come.
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2001
- Location
- Toronto, Ontario, Canada
AtomicGuY thats an awsome o/c... is there anyway u can bump it up anymore?
My question is wahts your CPU temp at (C) idle and full load?
what are the codes on that cpu u got
My question is wahts your CPU temp at (C) idle and full load?
what are the codes on that cpu u got
- Thread Starter
- #4
29c min / 53c max with Prime95
Using SK-6 with modded 10k rpm 80mm fan. And lots of Artic Silver2
My motherboard temp stays at 24c.
My dorb3 gave me fairly ok results, 31c/56c. My bud taunted me to get the SK-6, I was interested in the Gladiator but was glad I ended up with the SK-6
1400C
AYHJA Y
Using SK-6 with modded 10k rpm 80mm fan. And lots of Artic Silver2
My motherboard temp stays at 24c.
My dorb3 gave me fairly ok results, 31c/56c. My bud taunted me to get the SK-6, I was interested in the Gladiator but was glad I ended up with the SK-6
1400C
AYHJA Y
- Thread Starter
- #5
Unfortuneatly, the KG7-RAID limits me to a 12X multiplier. I can boot with 12 x 133 (1600MHz) with no problem but the 12.5X multiplier isnt avail because its for the 200bus chips with higher multipliers. I was wondering what the 1400 (200bus) chips are like? I would like to try the 14X multiplier!!
When the Palomino core comes out, I will for sure get a 200bus version since I can just lower the multiplier if I dont like the lower fsb.
When the Palomino core comes out, I will for sure get a 200bus version since I can just lower the multiplier if I dont like the lower fsb.
J
jr
Guest
Not to doubt your overclock but my Athlon Mp scores higher in 3dmark 2001 with my GF3 at 230/530 and so did my tb at 1550. Something is wrong with your setup you should be getting 7000 + scores on 3dmark 2001. I have yet to see any definitive proof of you running at these speeds. Why are the pictures so small? Show us some proof yet to see any yet. Here are my benches.
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2001
i am not doubting his scores...i can see that it says 1.84GHz in BOTH screens......as for the 3dmark, it is not all processor for that, it is the card
Good O/C bra....r u n SETI?
Good O/C bra....r u n SETI?
J
jr
Guest
How the hell can you see that **** I set my resolution at 640 x 480 and it is still hard to read and blurry. I have serious doubts.
J
jr
Guest
Ok big enough nice CPU you should try installing direct x 8.1 and the 12.90 detonator drivers you should score much better in 3dmark 2001. You have a 1 in a million CPU there. I havent even seen anyone hit over 1.7G without extreme voltages and watercooling. Lets see the wcpuid and prime 95 torture test in the background like my screenies. Then I will believe it.
J
jr
Guest
Hey man thanks you can understand why there is doubt. Yeah the 12.90 are much faster download them and direct x 8.1 and then bech it.
J
jr
Guest
Ok I see no reason why you would lie. Now get those 3dmark2001 scores up. That is an awesome overclock.
